RFR: 8364361: [process] java.lang.Process should implement Closeable [v15]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Wed Oct 8 05:29:09 UTC 2025
On Wed, 8 Oct 2025 02:11:53 GMT, Roger Riggs <rriggs at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The teardown of a Process launched by `ProcessBuilder` includes the closing of streams and ensuring the termination of the process is the responsibility of the caller. The `Process.close()` method provides a clear and obvious way to ensure all the streams are closed and the process terminated.
>>
>> The try-with-resources statement is frequently used to open streams and ensure they are closed on exiting the block. By implementing `AutoClosable.close()` the completeness of closing the streams and process termination can be done by try-with-resources.
>>
>> The actions of the `close()` method are to close each stream and destroy the process if it has not terminated.
>
> Roger Riggs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 22 additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - The ProcessCloseTest is modified to be able to test the logic
> around close() waiting for the process to exit and the specified
> behavior of interrupting the waitFor.
> - Close is modified to wait for the process to terminate before returning.
> Please review the revised javadoc.
> As suggested in review comments, waiting for the process to terminate
> allows a more orderly cleanup by the application.
> The streams are closed and close uses `waitFor()` with an unlimited timeout
> for the process to terminate.
> While waiting the thread can be `interrupted` to exit the `waitFor`.
> If/when `waitFor` is interrupted, the process is destroyedForcibly on
> all platforms. When close() returns, the thread interrupt will pending
> and can be handled by the caller.
> If a watchdog timeout is desired on close(), a separate thread
> can schedule an interrupt at a suitable time after close is called.
> - Review comment improvements to make expected behavior clearer.
> - Merge branch 'master' into 8364361-process-autocloseable
> - Clarify the use of waitFor after close() or T-W-R exit.
> - Additional review feedback.
> Updated to emphasize reading the data from the streams and calling waitFor
> to allow for normal termination.
> - Merge branch 'master' into 8364361-process-autocloseable
> - Address review comments for code and javadoc in Process, the test and the example.
> Reinforced that calling waitFor should occur before calling close to wait for termination and get the exitStatus.
> Corrected the error message check for invalid handles on Windows.
> Update test to allow normal completion when exceptions may be expected.
> Correct the expected message on Windows for an invalid handle exception.
> - Update close() to use "terminate" consistently.
> - Remove volatile from "closed" field; updates are guarded by synchronized.
> - ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/17e05424...6f8f7327
src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Process.java line 235:
> 233: destroyForcibly();
> 234: // Re-assert the interrupt
> 235: Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
I think this is still problematic as code after the t-w-r can't be guaranteed that the child has terminated. So I think it needs a loop that ends when waitFor completes without an exception (destroyForcibly would only be called on the first interrupt of course).
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26649#discussion_r2412541369
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list