RFR: 8347007: --strip-debug removes parameter names included with -parameters [v3]
Alan Bateman
alanb at openjdk.org
Thu Oct 9 13:46:26 UTC 2025
On Thu, 2 Oct 2025 05:40:49 GMT, Henry Jen <henryjen at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Since parameters is an opt-in choice, it's more reasonable to consider that's desired information and make strip parameter names an opt-in choice as well.
>>
>> This PR changes the default behavior of --strip-debug to keep parameter names when it's available. Add opt-in mechanism,
>> via the strip-java-debug-attributes plugin by using argument `--strip-java-debug-attributes=+parameter-names`.
>>
>> The --strip-debug option is a little bit odd, as it's a main option as well as a plugin option to enable the DefaultStripDebugPlugin, which strip native debug information on platform support the feature, and strip java debug information. In this PR, we chose to support only one mechanism to enable strip parameter names, so we would disable the embed StripJavaDebugAttributesPlugin when StripJavaDebugAttributesPlugin is enabled.
>>
>> The StripParameterNamesTest illustrate and verify parameter names use cases, mainly focus on argument processing and the parameter names. We didn't verify the regular debug info as that's covered by existing test.
>>
>> -- Update
>>
>> The latest change removed the support of strip parameter names, as the MethodParameters attribute is considered necessary attribute to fulfill Java Language Spec even though this attribute is considered optional by JVM spec.
>
> Henry Jen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> MethodParameters attribute should not be removed
test/jdk/tools/jlink/plugins/StripParameterNamesTest.java line 133:
> 131: .forEach(File::delete);
> 132: }
> 133: }
jdk.test.lib.util.FilesUtils has method for this.
test/jdk/tools/jlink/plugins/StripParameterNamesTest.java line 189:
> 187: Process process = processBuilder.start();
> 188: int exitCode = process.waitFor();
> 189: var output = process.inputReader().readLine();
Have you looked into using jdk.test.lib.process.ProcessTools?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27566#discussion_r2416845430
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27566#discussion_r2416846080
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list