RFR: 8367857: Implement JEP 525: Structured Concurrency (Sixth Preview) [v4]

[Alan Bateman]

On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:15:03 GMT, Viktor Klang <vklang at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Alan Bateman has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 15 additional commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Sync up from loom repo
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - Sync up from loom repo
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - Sync up from loom repo
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - Improve docs and review feedback
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8367857
>>  - ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/9c45d6d9...28617cff
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/StructuredTaskScope.java line 334:
> 
>> 332:  * #fork forking} of a subtask {@linkplain java.util.concurrent##MemoryVisibility
>> 333:  * <i>happen-before</i>} any actions taken by that subtask, which in turn
>> 334:  * <i>happen-before</i> the subtask result is {@linkplain Subtask#get() retrieved}.
> 
> This may be interpreted as users calling result() so it might be worth clarifying it as:
> 
> "<i>happen-before</i> the subtask result is {@linkplain Subtask#get() retrieved} by {@linkplain #join() join()}

The only change here is using the "##" in the link. So this is pre-existing wording (not changed in this update). I agree it could be mis-read and okay to change it.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27392#discussion_r2455861278