RFR: 8366478: BigDecimal roots
fabioromano1
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Oct 23 19:41:25 UTC 2025
On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 16:26:42 GMT, fabioromano1 <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> @fabioromano1 I think it is OK to have more efficient code even if the result is not correctly rounded.
>> Please add some code comment about your error analysis.
>
> @rgiulietti
>> * How much code would be needed to attain correct rounding in all modes?
>
> I found a way to make the procedure for correct rounding deterministic, but it would complicate the code a lot, and of course it would be potentially expensive in terms of running time, since the number of additional digits to compute is finite but not bounded by a constant. So, if it were to be implemented, I think the choice to have a correct rounding should be left to the user.
> @fabioromano1 Shall I file a name change for the `BigInteger` nth root, or would you prefer to do that yourself? I'm fine with both variants.
I'm fine if you do that.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27148#issuecomment-3438810920
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list