RFR: 8367382: Expand use of representation equivalence terminology [v2]
Joe Darcy
darcy at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 12 22:07:02 UTC 2025
On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:51:22 GMT, Raffaello Giulietti <rgiulietti at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Joe Darcy has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fix typo found in code review.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Float.java line 874:
>
>> 872: * returns the identical {@code int} value when applied to
>> 873: * each.
>> 874: * In other words, {@linkplain ##repEquivalence representation
>
> Suggestion:
>
> * In other words, {@linkplain Double##repEquivalence representation
>
> I think the class name is needed here.
Correct and fixed. (I though the javac/javadoc doctlint checks should catch that kind of problem, but apparently not.) Thanks.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27232#discussion_r2345511287
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list