RFR: 8334015: Add Support for UUID Version 7 (UUIDv7) defined in RFC 9562 [v14]
Roger Riggs
rriggs at openjdk.org
Tue Sep 23 17:09:18 UTC 2025
On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:46:12 GMT, Kieran Farrell <kfarrell at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> With the recent approval of UUIDv7 (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9562/), this PR aims to add a new static method UUID.timestampUUID() which constructs and returns a UUID in support of the new time generated UUID version.
>>
>> The specification requires embedding the current timestamp in milliseconds into the first bits 0–47. The version number in bits 48–51, bits 52–63 are available for sub-millisecond precision or for pseudorandom data. The variant is set in bits 64–65. The remaining bits 66–127 are free to use for more pseudorandom data or to employ a counter based approach for increased time percision (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9562.html#name-uuid-version-7).
>>
>> The choice of implementation comes down to balancing the sensitivity level of being able to distingush UUIDs created below <1ms apart with performance. A test simulating a high-concurrency environment with 4 threads generating 10000 UUIDv7 values in parallel to measure the collision rate of each implementation (the amount of times the time based portion of the UUID was not unique and entries could not distinguished by time) yeilded the following results for each implemtation:
>>
>>
>> - random-byte-only - 99.8%
>> - higher-precision - 3.5%
>> - counter-based - 0%
>>
>>
>> Performance tests show a decrease in performance as expected with the counter based implementation due to the introduction of synchronization:
>>
>> - random-byte-only 143.487 ± 10.932 ns/op
>> - higher-precision 149.651 ± 8.438 ns/op
>> - counter-based 245.036 ± 2.943 ns/op
>>
>> The best balance here might be to employ a higher-precision implementation as the large increase in time sensitivity comes at a very slight performance cost.
>
> Kieran Farrell has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> update method name
Given the full scope of monotonicity including across application and runtime restarts is a much larger requirement.
The current API addition was introduced **only** to support UUID as a holder of a version 7 UUID.
The API simplifies the construction of a V7 UUID but does not make the more comprehensive guarantees.
I think that could/should be considered a separate initiative.
It would be beneficial to layer that Java support for a fully supported V7 on top of support by the operating system function. I don't think it can be delivered without OS support.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25303#issuecomment-3324875474
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list