RFR: 8368498: Use JUnit instead of TestNG for jdk_text tests

[Justin Lu]

On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:05:56 GMT, Naoto Sato <naoto at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Please review this PR which converts all the _TestNG_ based tests under jdk_text to use _JUnit_.
>> 
>> The changes are done in the following order,
>> 
>> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/a7840e72269202dfca99d5ce5109bd4f7af0f578: Conversions automated via [script](https://github.com/lahodaj/netbeans/tree/19515c3e2dbc07d977ca227d933197f856121ae5/java/java.openjdk.project/junit-convert).
>> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/2466c5ee970965e57978d8b55b5b7dcad6c2aa6c: Updating to default recommended visibility of test methods + data providers. Cleaning up imports.
>> - https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/27c439804db61e26d48d7239fd28c99258cb4a9f: Copyright years updated.
>
> test/jdk/java/text/Format/CompactNumberFormat/TestUExtensionOverride.java line 36:
> 
>> 34: import org.junit.jupiter.params.ParameterizedTest;
>> 35: import org.junit.jupiter.params.provider.MethodSource;
>> 36: 
> 
> Probably done with the script, but it's interesting it would put junit impots before java's.

Actually, the import changes were done based off my default IntelliJ settings for optimize/clean imports. Before conversion, the TestNG tests had cases where the _org.testng.*_ imports were both above and below the _java.*_ imports.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27460#discussion_r2376672149