RFR: 8365588: defineClass that accepts a ByteBuffer does not work as expected

Xueming Shen sherman at openjdk.org
Tue Sep 30 20:29:18 UTC 2025


On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 19:58:58 GMT, Chen Liang <liach at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The separate method keeps it easier to audit (and review) so I'd prefer to keep it as proposed. It is very possible that we will have additional cases to trust in the future and it would complicated the conditions in the caller if everything is in one method.
>
> Why is the ProtectionDomain named `pb` instead of `pd`? What does `b` stand for?

typo :-(

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27569#discussion_r2392756150


More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list