RFR: 8373118: Test java/lang/Thread/virtual/Starvation.java timed out [v17]
Doug Lea
dl at openjdk.org
Thu Jan 8 16:32:07 UTC 2026
On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 22:56:50 GMT, Viktor Klang <vklang at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Doug Lea has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 24 additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - Not sure why this merge is necessary
>> Merge remote-tracking branch 'refs/remotes/origin/JDK-8373118' into JDK-8373118
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - Fix deactivate; faster quiescence
>> - recheck avoiding cross-class offsets
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - Check reworked ordering control
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into JDK-8373118
>> - ... and 14 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/dd183022...556c5201
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/concurrent/ForkJoinPool.java line 1307:
>
>> 1305: ForkJoinTask<?>[] a = array;
>> 1306: int b = base, s = top - 1, cap;
>> 1307: if (a != null && s - b >= 0 && (cap = a.length) > 0) {
>
> Would it help to make the assignment to `cap` be `(cap = a.length - 1) >= 0` and then eliminate the `(cap - 1)` in the slotOffset calculations on both sides of `fifo`-branches?
There are still some remnants of code coping with annoying fact that C1 needed to have cap (not cap - 1) in a local to do the bounds check elision. I don't think it is needed anymore.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28797#discussion_r2673038453
More information about the core-libs-dev
mailing list