<div dir="ltr"><div>This is the deprecation issue: <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357179">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357179</a></div><div>Deprecation patch PR: <a href="https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25282">https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25282</a></div><div>Deprecation CSR: <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357180">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357180</a></div><div>Deprecation Release Note: <a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357181">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357181</a></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers, Thomas</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Thomas Stüfe <<a href="mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com">thomas.stuefe@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Side note, I did not find any tests for the VFORK mode. Even the FORK mode seems not that well covered ( we only seem to run java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java in FORK mode)</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:59 PM Thomas Stüfe <<a href="mailto:thomas.stuefe@gmail.com" target="_blank">thomas.stuefe@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I am fine with waiting past 25, though the continued existence of this mode makes me apprehensive. Back at SAP I have seen real customer issues from these kind of problems, and we only catched those out of accident.<div><br></div><div>A separate deprecation for JDK 25 may be a good first step (a warning, but continued acceptance, of the VFORK mode)</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 6:20 PM Joseph D. Darcy <<a href="mailto:joe.darcy@oracle.com" target="_blank">joe.darcy@oracle.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div>I concur that this work is better down
early in JDK 26.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Joe<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On 5/16/2025 12:26 AM, Thomas Stüfe
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Okay, moved the release version to 26.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Could one of you (you or <a class="gmail_plusreply" id="m_-6609380335958514037m_-7263980124021690272m_4774361106841856470plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:roger.riggs@oracle.com" target="_blank">@Roger Riggs</a> )
review the CSR if you have the cycles to spare?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357090" target="_blank">https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8357090</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks!</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 16, 2025 at
7:56 AM Alan Bateman <<a href="mailto:alan.bateman@oracle.com" target="_blank">alan.bateman@oracle.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> On 16/05/2025 05:10, Thomas Stüfe wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you, Alan. I will prepare a patch and a
CSR.</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Okay, and maybe something for early in JDK 26 to avoid
touching this area close to the fork for JDK 25 RDP1.<br>
<br>
-Alan<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>