FJP::setParallelism update

Volker Simonis volker.simonis at gmail.com
Fri May 27 13:51:32 UTC 2022


Dan Heidinga <heidinga at redhat.com> schrieb am Fr., 27. Mai 2022, 05:51:

> > > How often should we plan to update the crac branch from the mainline?
> >
> > I'd like to keep the branch with JDK17 (the latest LTS). How about crac
> > branch receiving updates from openjdk/jdk/master, and crac-17u from
> > openjdk/jdk17u/master? And to encourage doing backports of CRaC-specific
> > changes from crac to crac-17u, bit don't make that mandatory.
> >
> > If this is OK, we'll need to fork off crac-17u first.
>
> That sounds like a reasonable approach if we want to track both the
> main dev line and the last LTS.  Backporting patches may become a
> nuisance but given the rate of change in crac today, this seems like
> an OK starting point.


> I'm curious about the value of tracking the LTS though given we'll
> need to merge to mainline when crac graduates.  Is the intention to
> make it easier for users to try out under their existing deployments?
>

This sounds reasonable to me as well. I agree that the main dev line should
be the master but we should try to downport on a best effort base. I think
it's already hard for many users to run their application on 17 and only
supporting the latest version would complicate experimentation even more.


> --Dan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Anton
> >
>
>


More information about the crac-dev mailing list