[crac] RFR: RCU Lock - RW lock with very lightweight read- and heavyweight write-locking [v5]
Radim Vansa
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Apr 13 13:36:17 UTC 2023
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:20:20 GMT, Anton Kozlov <akozlov at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Radim Vansa has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add synchronized context
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/crac/RCULock.java line 141:
>
>> 139: * @param readCriticalMethods List of signatures for methods invoked in the read-critical section.
>> 140: */
>> 141: public RCULock(String[] readCriticalMethods) {
>
> It's a big question, why (from the interface point of view) the lock should know methods in which it can be used.
>
> The second tier question, why the method names are String[] and not Method[] at least.
There's no point in asking 'why'. Interface is there to specify a contract. You declare the methods, and then the implementation fulfills the contract. And you already know why from the point of implementation.
There is another constructor that accepts `Method[]`, being able to specify the signature is just an option if it's more convenient.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/58#discussion_r1165530405
More information about the crac-dev
mailing list