[crac] RFR: Merge jdk:jdk-25+22 [v2]
duke
duke at openjdk.org
Thu Jul 17 10:53:06 UTC 2025
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:09:35 GMT, Dmitry Cherepanov <dcherepanov at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Merge with jdk-25+22
>>
>> Attaching output of `--diff-merges=remerge`
>>
>> <details>
>>
>> <summary>jdk-25+20</summary>
>>
>>
>> commit 28128cb4e515074ced2dfd4cd371bebe4cdc4dbc
>> Merge: 698225b6594 953eef4f113
>> Author: Dmitry Cherepanov <dcherepanov at azul.com>
>> Date: Tue Jul 15 11:33:36 2025 +0400
>>
>> Merge with jdk-25+20
>>
>> diff --git a/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/globals_x86.hpp b/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/globals_x86.hpp
>> remerge CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/hotspot/cpu/x86/globals_x86.hpp
>> index 2d380144da1..103fde55fb3 100644
>> --- a/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/globals_x86.hpp
>> +++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/x86/globals_x86.hpp
>> @@ -192,7 +192,6 @@ define_pd_global(intx, InitArrayShortSize, 8*BytesPerLong);
>> "Turn off JVM mitigations related to Intel micro code " \
>> "mitigations for the Intel JCC erratum") \
>> \
>> -<<<<<<< 698225b6594 (Merge jdk:jdk-25+19)
>> product(ccstr, CPUFeatures, nullptr, "CPU feature set, " \
>> "use -XX:CPUFeatures=0xnumber with -XX:CRaCCheckpointTo when you " \
>> "get an error during -XX:CRaCRestoreFrom on a different machine; " \
>> @@ -205,18 +204,16 @@ define_pd_global(intx, InitArrayShortSize, 8*BytesPerLong);
>> \
>> product(bool, IgnoreCPUFeatures, false, RESTORE_SETTABLE | EXPERIMENTAL, \
>> "Do not refuse to run after -XX:CRaCRestoreFrom finds out some " \
>> - "CPU features are missing")
>> -
>> -=======
>> + "CPU features are missing") \
>> + \
>> product(int, X86ICacheSync, -1, DIAGNOSTIC, \
>> "Select the X86 ICache sync mechanism: -1 = auto-select; " \
>> "0 = none (dangerous); 1 = CLFLUSH loop; 2 = CLFLUSHOPT loop; "\
>> "3 = CLWB loop; 4 = single CPUID; 5 = single SERIALIZE. " \
>> "Explicitly selected mechanism will fail at startup if " \
>> "hardware does not support it.") \
>> - range(-1, 5) \
>> - \
>> ->>>>>>> 953eef4f113 (8347337: ZGC: String dedups short-live...
>
> Dmitry Cherepanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> cleanup
@dimitryc
Your change (at version 31023e21e6af689f4e9ea7e74197a772a58a7e48) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/crac/pull/244#issuecomment-3083584021
More information about the crac-dev
mailing list