Initial CSR FAQ items

[joe darcy]

Hello,

On 4/9/2017 7:18 AM, Doug Lea wrote:
> On 04/07/2017 10:56 PM, joe darcy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please review and comment on the the starter population of FAQ items
>> below. These FAQ items generally do not deal with the logistics of using
>> the CSR issue type; such items will be written after there is a public
>> prototype of the CSR issue type.
>
> The only other questions I can think of are logistics related.
> So, so far, it looks good to me! Thanks for taking this on.
>

Thanks for the comments on and off list. I've thought of another FAQ to 
include:

Q: What are common types of feedback for the CSR to give?
A: Common outcomes for a proposal after review by the CSR include:
    * Approved with no comments; this is most likely for small requests.
    * Deferring CSR review until additional technical reviewers examine 
the proposal.
    * Approving the proposal, but with comments affecting the code 
review. For example, the CSR may find issues with the javadoc that do 
not change the specification, etc.
    * Approving the proposal, on the condition that a release note is 
written for the change.
    * Substantive comments that require more extensive changes to the 
request.

I plan to start populating the wiki with amended versions of the 
previously sent FAQ items.

Thanks,

-Joe