From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Tue Nov 13 09:20:09 2012
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:20:09 -0500 (EST)
Subject: CVMI Membership Nomination (Neil Richards)
In-Reply-To: <509031D9.2040501@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <745370646.130261.1352827209442.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>



----- Original Message -----
> On 10/23/12 3:04 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > 
> > Did this ever actually go through?  Neil is still not listed as
> > having
> > commit access on http://openjdk.java.net/census#cvmi
> > 
> Did you let the registrar know about the change?
> 
> 

They were CCed originally...
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07


From mark.reinhold at oracle.com  Tue Nov 13 14:48:14 2012
From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:48:14 -0800
Subject: CVMI Membership Nomination (Neil Richards)
In-Reply-To: gnu.andrew@redhat.com; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:20:09 EST;
	<745370646.130261.1352827209442.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20121113224814.4ABB3EE6@eggemoggin.niobe.net>

2012/11/13 9:20 -0800, gnu.andrew at redhat.com:
>> On 10/23/12 3:04 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> Did this ever actually go through?  Neil is still not listed as
>>> having
>>> commit access on http://openjdk.java.net/census#cvmi
>>> 
>> Did you let the registrar know about the change?
> 
> They were CCed originally...

I have no record of a "Result: New cvmi Committer" message having been
sent to registrar at openjdk.java.net.  A message with a non-matching
subject line may have been discarded.

The protocol for nominating new Committers is documented here:
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-committer .

- Mark

From gnu.andrew at redhat.com  Wed Nov 14 17:08:51 2012
From: gnu.andrew at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:08:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject: CVMI Membership Nomination (Neil Richards)
In-Reply-To: <20121113224814.4ABB3EE6@eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <1500806662.906238.1352941731384.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>



----- Original Message -----
> 2012/11/13 9:20 -0800, gnu.andrew at redhat.com:
> >> On 10/23/12 3:04 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> Did this ever actually go through?  Neil is still not listed as
> >>> having
> >>> commit access on http://openjdk.java.net/census#cvmi
> >>> 
> >> Did you let the registrar know about the change?
> > 
> > They were CCed originally...
> 
> I have no record of a "Result: New cvmi Committer" message having
> been
> sent to registrar at openjdk.java.net.  A message with a non-matching
> subject line may have been discarded.
> 
> The protocol for nominating new Committers is documented here:
> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-committer .
> 
> - Mark
> 

Well, we started that process and then there was all this discussion
of "oh you don't need to do this" etc.  I'll send a results e-mail now.
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07


From ahughes at redhat.com  Mon Nov 19 16:07:58 2012
From: ahughes at redhat.com (Andrew Hughes)
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Result: New CVMI Committer: Neil Richards (ngmr)
In-Reply-To: <1995784101.3064570.1353369942662.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1884590622.3064738.1353370078321.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>

Voting for Neil Richards [1] is now closed.

Yes: 1
Veto: 0
Abstain: 0

According to the Bylaws definition of Lazy Consensus, this is
sufficient to approve the nomination.

[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/cvmi-dev/2012-July/000047.html
-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07