From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Tue Apr 1 15:41:57 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:41:57 +0000 Subject: FOSDEM 07 and 08 Message-ID: <17c6771e0804010841p11fd59f3o1414a2579300d666@mail.gmail.com> I've (finally) posted all my photos and movies from the last two Free Java FOSDEM events. Apologies for not having more of this year's event; must remember to take more batteries next time! See http://fuseyism.com/ for the goodies. -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Wed Apr 9 00:20:37 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 01:20:37 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK in Sheffield Message-ID: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> Dear OpenJDK people, Allow me to put on a different hat for this mail. I currently have the role of being Sun's Campus Ambassador at the University of Sheffield. The idea is basically to try and get students and staff interested in Sun stuff, and there's a particular focus on Sun's FOSS work, which is what interested me. http://developers.sun.com/students/ Technical demos/talks form a major part of this. We already host one on OpenSolaris and ZFS last month, and have plans for ones on Xvm and Sun SPOT by the end of this month. Of obvious interest to me is to get one in on OpenJDK before the end of the semester (mid-May), especially as this is not being as strongly promoted in the programme as e.g. OpenSolaris and NetBeans. The purpose of this mail was to see if there was any OpenJDK/IcedTea people located in the UK (or around next month) who would be interested in being involved. The idea is basically to have a session that introduces students and staff to the OpenJDK project and current developments like IcedTea, the porters project and the Innovation Challenge. Given that all the students are taught Java from their first year, there's a good chance some of the more talented ones might be interested in contributing. At the very least, they should be aware of how the Sun JDK is transitioning to a new Free Software world. I'll probably put a few more general points on Free Software and community to back this up. Anyway, feel free to e-mail me if you have something to contribute, even if it's just resources rather than your own time. I'd be grateful for any input. Thanks, -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 From robilad at kaffe.org Wed Apr 9 12:04:09 2008 From: robilad at kaffe.org (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:04:09 +0200 Subject: OpenJDK in Sheffield In-Reply-To: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> References: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47FCB0B9.7010402@kaffe.org> Andrew John Hughes wrote: > The purpose of this mail was to see if there was any OpenJDK/IcedTea > people located in the UK (or around next month) who would be > interested in being involved. The idea is basically to have a session > that introduces students and staff to the OpenJDK project and current > developments like IcedTea, the porters project and the Innovation > Challenge. Hi Andrew, we talked about this briefly on #openjdk, so for the benefit of the list, which date would you have in mind? cheers, dalibor topic From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Wed Apr 9 17:02:25 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:02:25 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK in Sheffield In-Reply-To: <47FCB0B9.7010402@kaffe.org> References: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> <47FCB0B9.7010402@kaffe.org> Message-ID: <17c6771e0804091002y1ce4e109q7d6283348b29d2d0@mail.gmail.com> On 09/04/2008, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > > The purpose of this mail was to see if there was any OpenJDK/IcedTea > > people located in the UK (or around next month) who would be > > interested in being involved. The idea is basically to have a session > > that introduces students and staff to the OpenJDK project and current > > developments like IcedTea, the porters project and the Innovation > > Challenge. > > > > Hi Andrew, > > we talked about this briefly on #openjdk, so for the benefit of the list, > which date would you have in mind? > > cheers, > dalibor topic > Was going to write a similar mail but you beat me to it :) The date I now have in mind, after thinking about it more carefully then when I wrote the original mail, is the afternoon of Wednesday, May the 14th. -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 From aph at redhat.com Wed Apr 9 17:35:49 2008 From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley) Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:35:49 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK in Sheffield In-Reply-To: <17c6771e0804091002y1ce4e109q7d6283348b29d2d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> <47FCB0B9.7010402@kaffe.org> <17c6771e0804091002y1ce4e109q7d6283348b29d2d0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47FCFE75.6070708@redhat.com> Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 09/04/2008, Dalibor Topic wrote: >> Andrew John Hughes wrote: >> >>> The purpose of this mail was to see if there was any OpenJDK/IcedTea >>> people located in the UK (or around next month) who would be >>> interested in being involved. The idea is basically to have a session >>> that introduces students and staff to the OpenJDK project and current >>> developments like IcedTea, the porters project and the Innovation >>> Challenge. >>> >> Hi Andrew, >> >> we talked about this briefly on #openjdk, so for the benefit of the list, >> which date would you have in mind? >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> > > Was going to write a similar mail but you beat me to it :) > > The date I now have in mind, after thinking about it more carefully > then when I wrote the original mail, is the afternoon of Wednesday, > May the 14th. I'll bite. Andrew. From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Wed Apr 9 18:29:34 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 19:29:34 +0100 Subject: OpenJDK in Sheffield In-Reply-To: <47FCFE75.6070708@redhat.com> References: <17c6771e0804081720s666c4120mcfe25a9641fd013e@mail.gmail.com> <47FCB0B9.7010402@kaffe.org> <17c6771e0804091002y1ce4e109q7d6283348b29d2d0@mail.gmail.com> <47FCFE75.6070708@redhat.com> Message-ID: <17c6771e0804091129g67d8e1e6s1c9ef4b8bd61f81d@mail.gmail.com> On 09/04/2008, Andrew Haley wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > On 09/04/2008, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> Andrew John Hughes wrote: > >> > >>> The purpose of this mail was to see if there was any OpenJDK/IcedTea > >>> people located in the UK (or around next month) who would be > >>> interested in being involved. The idea is basically to have a session > >>> that introduces students and staff to the OpenJDK project and current > >>> developments like IcedTea, the porters project and the Innovation > >>> Challenge. > >>> > >> Hi Andrew, > >> > >> we talked about this briefly on #openjdk, so for the benefit of the list, > >> which date would you have in mind? > >> > >> cheers, > >> dalibor topic > >> > > > > Was going to write a similar mail but you beat me to it :) > > > > The date I now have in mind, after thinking about it more carefully > > then when I wrote the original mail, is the afternoon of Wednesday, > > May the 14th. > > > I'll bite. > > > Andrew. > > I hoped you might ;) That'd be great. I want to make sure the whole IcedTea and RedHat involvement is properly represented, as I feel it's done a great deal to drive early adoption of OpenJDK within the existing FOSS community. Thanks, -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 From neal at gafter.com Thu Apr 10 06:17:00 2008 From: neal at gafter.com (Neal Gafter) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 23:17:00 -0700 Subject: Project Proposal: Closures for Java Message-ID: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> Please reply to discuss at openjdk.java.net In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project "Closures for Java". This project will be used for the development of the OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of the same name http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-February/000047.html. Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK Challenge Rules http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose this project be sponsored by the OpenJDK compiler group http://openjdk.java.net/groups/compiler/ and hereby call for votes on the formation of the project within the compiler group. I volunteer to be the moderator of the project. Members of the compiler group: please vote on the creation of this project by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM Thu Apr 10 14:42:48 2008 From: Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:42:48 -0700 Subject: Project Proposal: Closures for Java In-Reply-To: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> References: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes On Apr 9, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Neal Gafter wrote: > Please reply to discuss at openjdk.java.net > > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ > I hereby propose an openjdk project "Closures for Java". This > project will be used for the development of the OpenJDK Community > Innovators' Challenge proposal of the same name http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-February/000047.html > . Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK > Challenge Rules http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose > this project be sponsored by the OpenJDK compiler group http://openjdk.java.net/groups/compiler/ > and hereby call for votes on the formation of the project within > the compiler group. I volunteer to be the moderator of the project. > > Members of the compiler group: please vote on the creation of this > project by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From neal at gafter.com Thu Apr 10 14:50:33 2008 From: neal at gafter.com (Neal Gafter) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:50:33 -0700 Subject: Project Proposal: Closures for Java In-Reply-To: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> References: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <15e8b9d20804100750v1441dbb7q5e36dd57a26eeb2f@mail.gmail.com> Vote: Yes On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Neal Gafter wrote: > Please reply to discuss at openjdk.java.net > > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project > "Closures for Java". This project will be used for the development of the > OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of the same name > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-February/000047.html. > Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK Challenge Rules > http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose this project be > sponsored by the OpenJDK compiler group > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/compiler/ and hereby call for votes on the > formation of the project within the compiler group. I volunteer to be the > moderator of the project. > > Members of the compiler group: please vote on the creation of this project > by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mr at sun.com Thu Apr 10 17:36:00 2008 From: mr at sun.com (Mark Reinhold) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:36:00 -0700 Subject: Project Proposal: Closures for Java In-Reply-To: neal@gafter.com; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:17:00 PDT; <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080410173600.5A52E5B65B@eggemoggin.niobe.net> > Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 23:17:00 -0700 > From: Neal Gafter > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project > "Closures for Java". This project will be used for the development of the > OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of the same name > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-February/000047.html. > Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK Challenge Rules > http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose this project be > sponsored by the OpenJDK compiler group > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/compiler/ and hereby call for votes on the > formation of the project within the compiler group. I volunteer to be the > moderator of the project. > > Members of the compiler group: please vote on the creation of this project > by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. Thanks for this proposal. Two procedural points: - Proposals for new Projects and Groups should be sent only to the announce list. That list is configured to direct all replies to the discuss list. There's no need to send proposals to the discuss list, or to any other list; that just tends to create duplicate messages and difficult-to-follow multiple threads of discussion. - If a Group wishes to sponsor a Project then a vote should be called for, and held, on the Group's mailing list rather than on the general discuss list. The Moderator, in this case Jon Gibbons, should report the result of the vote in a reply, on the discuss list, to the original proposal. Most votes so far have run more or less along these lines, but these two points aren't made explicitly, or as explicitly as they could be, in the interim governance guidelines. I'll propose a revision for the IGB's review soon. - Mark From Dmitri.Trembovetski at Sun.COM Thu Apr 10 17:56:29 2008 From: Dmitri.Trembovetski at Sun.COM (Dmitri Trembovetski) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 10:56:29 -0700 Subject: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Project Proposal: "XRender Java2D Backend" In-Reply-To: <194f62550804101046q7453c57fu7cb3419cbe71289@mail.gmail.com> References: <194f62550804101046q7453c57fu7cb3419cbe71289@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47FE54CD.3050504@Sun.COM> Vote: yes Clemens Eisserer wrote: > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project > "XRender Java2D Backend". This project will be used for the > development of the OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of > the name "Implement XRender pipeline for Java2D" sent to the openjdk > challenge list. > I propose this project be sponsored by the OpenJDK 2d-dev group and > hereby call for votes on the formation of the project within the > 2d-dev group. I volunteer to be the moderator of the project. > > Members of the 2d-dev group: please vote on the creation of this > project by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. From asouma3 at yahoo.fr Thu Apr 10 19:27:07 2008 From: asouma3 at yahoo.fr (asma belhadj) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:27:07 +0000 (GMT) Subject: No subject Message-ID: <348356.65226.qm@web28113.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> asouma3 at yahoo.fr _____________________________________________________________________________ Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From neal at gafter.com Thu Apr 10 19:40:43 2008 From: neal at gafter.com (Neal Gafter) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:40:43 -0700 Subject: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] Project Proposal: "XRender Java2D Backend" In-Reply-To: <47FE54CD.3050504@Sun.COM> References: <194f62550804101046q7453c57fu7cb3419cbe71289@mail.gmail.com> <47FE54CD.3050504@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <15e8b9d20804101240v646f2eb4j1774d108466b60d7@mail.gmail.com> I think you need a member of a group to propose and moderate a project. On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Dmitri Trembovetski < Dmitri.Trembovetski at sun.com> wrote: > > Vote: yes > > Clemens Eisserer wrote: > > > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project > > "XRender Java2D Backend". This project will be used for the > > development of the OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of > > the name "Implement XRender pipeline for Java2D" sent to the openjdk > > challenge list. > > I propose this project be sponsored by the OpenJDK 2d-dev group and > > hereby call for votes on the formation of the project within the > > 2d-dev group. I volunteer to be the moderator of the project. > > > > Members of the 2d-dev group: please vote on the creation of this > > project by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net. > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Maurizio.Cimadamore at Sun.COM Thu Apr 10 20:04:43 2008 From: Maurizio.Cimadamore at Sun.COM (Maurizio Cimadamore) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:04:43 +0100 Subject: Project Proposal: Closures for Java In-Reply-To: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> References: <15e8b9d20804092317y4bf81b73ie29c93b9b404958a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <47FE72DB.1080408@sun.com> Vote: yes Neal Gafter wrote: > Please reply to discuss at openjdk.java.net > > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ I hereby propose an openjdk project > "Closures for Java". This project will be used for the development of > the OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal of the same name > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-February/000047.html. > Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK Challenge > Rules http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose this > project be sponsored by the OpenJDK compiler group > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/compiler/ and hereby call for votes on > the formation of the project within the compiler group. I volunteer > to be the moderator of the project. > > Members of the compiler group: please vote on the creation of this > project by responding to discuss at openjdk.java.net > . From Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM Thu Apr 10 21:33:22 2008 From: Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM (Xiomara Jayasena) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:33:22 -0700 Subject: OpenJDK 7 source bundles Message-ID: <47FE87A2.60500@sun.com> Hi, The OpenJDK 7 source bundle has been created and placed here: http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7/ OpenJDK * Source openjdk-7-ea-src-b25-10_apr_2008.zip , 80.52 MB (MD5 Checksum ) Repository http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 Going forward the above bundle will be made available with every build. The source can also be pull from the Mercurial repositories located at: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 Thanks, -Xiomara -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM Mon Apr 14 19:39:11 2008 From: Jonathan.Gibbons at Sun.COM (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:39:11 -0700 Subject: CFV: Project sponsorship: Closures For Java In-Reply-To: <8E77F0B7-4245-4E2F-97F8-E7E54515D633@Sun.COM> References: <8E77F0B7-4245-4E2F-97F8-E7E54515D633@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <4803B2DF.3040103@sun.com> Having achieved unanimous support from all eligible voting members in favor of sponsoring this project, the vote is hereby concluded. The outcome is that the Compiler Group is in favor of the sponsoring the proposed new project, "Closures For Java." -- Jon Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > Question: Should the Compiler Group sponsor the proposed new > Closures For Java Project? [1] > > Please cast your vote by replying, publicly, to this message with > either > > Vote: yes > > or > > Vote: no > > as the first line of the message body. > > You may, at your option, indicate the reason for your decision on > subsequent lines. > > Votes must be cast in the open; votes sent as private replies will > not be counted. > > The sponsorship decision will be made by a simple majority vote of > the Group's Members. Votes are due by midnight UTC next Friday, > 18 April. If an absolute majority of the Group's Members votes > one way or the other prior to that time then the decision may be > rendered earlier. Once a decision has been made the votes will be > tallied and reported to this list and to discuss at openjdk.java.net > . > > Only Members of the Compiler' Group are eligible to vote on this > decision. The current Members are: > > Alex Buckley > Maurizio Cimadamore > Iris Clark > Joe Darcy > Neal Gafter > Jonathan Gibbons > Kumar Srinivasan > > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2008-April/001143.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From java.net at freetocreate.org Mon Apr 14 20:19:06 2008 From: java.net at freetocreate.org (Rob Leland) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:19:06 -0400 Subject: CFV: Project sponsorship: Closures For Java In-Reply-To: <4803B2DF.3040103@sun.com> References: <8E77F0B7-4245-4E2F-97F8-E7E54515D633@Sun.COM> <4803B2DF.3040103@sun.com> Message-ID: <4803BC3A.50001@freetocreate.org> Hi, At one time there were at least 3 proposals for closures in Java. Having not followed closely the different closure proposal statuses what does this mean ? Does this mean that one of the 3 proposals has been selected and that all thats needed for a future JDK inclusion is an reference implementation ? -Rob Jonathan Gibbons wrote: > Having achieved unanimous support from all eligible voting members > in favor of sponsoring this project, the vote is hereby concluded. > > The outcome is that the Compiler Group is in favor of the sponsoring > the proposed new project, "Closures For Java." > > -- Jon > > > Jonathan Gibbons wrote: >> Question: Should the Compiler Group sponsor the proposed new >> Closures For Java Project? [1] >> >> Please cast your vote by replying, publicly, to this message with >> either >> >> Vote: yes >> >> or >> >> Vote: no >> >> as the first line of the message body. >> >> You may, at your option, indicate the reason for your decision on >> subsequent lines. >> >> Votes must be cast in the open; votes sent as private replies will >> not be counted. >> >> The sponsorship decision will be made by a simple majority vote of >> the Group's Members. Votes are due by midnight UTC next Friday, >> 18 April. If an absolute majority of the Group's Members votes >> one way or the other prior to that time then the decision may be >> rendered earlier. Once a decision has been made the votes will be >> tallied and reported to this list and to discuss at openjdk.java.net >> . >> >> Only Members of the Compiler' Group are eligible to vote on this >> decision. The current Members are: >> >> Alex Buckley >> Maurizio Cimadamore >> Iris Clark >> Joe Darcy >> Neal Gafter >> Jonathan Gibbons >> Kumar Srinivasan >> >> >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2008-April/001143.html > From neal at gafter.com Mon Apr 14 20:39:16 2008 From: neal at gafter.com (Neal Gafter) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:39:16 -0700 Subject: CFV: Project sponsorship: Closures For Java In-Reply-To: <4803BC3A.50001@freetocreate.org> References: <8E77F0B7-4245-4E2F-97F8-E7E54515D633@Sun.COM> <4803B2DF.3040103@sun.com> <4803BC3A.50001@freetocreate.org> Message-ID: <15e8b9d20804141339s7e61c6a0te968cc27e201b3c6@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Rob Leland wrote: > At one time there were at least 3 proposals for closures in Java. > Having not followed closely the different closure proposal statuses what > does this mean ? > Does this mean that one of the 3 proposals has been selected and that all > thats needed for a future > JDK inclusion is an reference implementation ? This means that one language proposal will have its own openjdk project for its implementation. It doesn't imply any decision about the future of the Java language specification. Proponents of other language proposals can create openjdk projects for their work if they want. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Phil.Race at Sun.COM Wed Apr 16 17:47:18 2008 From: Phil.Race at Sun.COM (Phil Race) Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:47:18 -0700 Subject: CFV: Project sponsorship: XRender Java2D Pipeline In-Reply-To: <47FE9E7E.7090205@sun.com> References: <47FE9E7E.7090205@sun.com> Message-ID: <48063BA6.8040806@sun.com> Regarding the CFV on the question : "Should the 2D Group sponsor the new XRender Java2D Pipeline Project?" I have now received "Yes" votes from 6 members of the 2D group : Since this constitutes an absolute majority of the eligible voting members I am able to immediately render the decision of the group which is to sponsor the XRender project. The vote is now concluded. -Phil. From Paul.Hohensee at Sun.COM Fri Apr 18 15:36:20 2008 From: Paul.Hohensee at Sun.COM (Paul Hohensee) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:36:20 -0400 Subject: Project Proposal: Common VM Interface Message-ID: <4808BFF4.50708@sun.com> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From James.Melvin at Sun.COM Fri Apr 18 15:50:21 2008 From: James.Melvin at Sun.COM (James.Melvin at Sun.COM) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:50:21 -0400 Subject: Project Proposal: Common VM Interface In-Reply-To: <4808BFF4.50708@sun.com> References: <4808BFF4.50708@sun.com> Message-ID: <4808C33D.2020700@Sun.COM> YES Paul Hohensee wrote: > Please reply to discuss at openjdk.java.net > > In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines for projects > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ > I hereby propose an OpenJDK project "Comon VM Interface". This project > will be used > for the development of the OpenJDK Community Innovators' Challenge proposal > "Virtual Machine Interface" described at > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/challenge-discuss/2008-March/000084.html > > Development as an OpenJDK project is required by the OpenJDK Challenge > Rules http://openjdk.java.net/challenge/rules/. I propose this project > be sponsored by the > OpenJDK Hotspot group http://openjdk.java.net/groups/hotspot/ > and hereby call for > votes on the formation of the project within the Hotspot group. I > volunteer to be the > moderator of the project. > > Members of the Hotspot group: please vote on the creation of this > project by responding > to discuss at openjdk.java.net . > > Thanks, > > Paul > From iris at sun.com Fri Apr 18 19:49:31 2008 From: iris at sun.com (iris clark) Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: CVF: Project sponsorship: More New I/O APIs for the Java Platform (JSR-203) Message-ID: <200804181949.m3IJnVmW019457@ribbit.SFBay.Sun.COM> Regarding the CFV on the following question[1]: Should the Core Libraries Group sponsor the "More New I/O APIs for the Java Platform (JSR-203) Project? Voting has now concluded. I have received "Yes" votes from the following 9 members of the Core Libraries Group: Christopher Hegarty David Bristor Doug Lea Iris Clark Joe Darcy Mark Reinhold Martin Buchholz Pete Soper Xueming Shen This constitues an absolute majority of the eligible voting members. Thus I am able to immediately render a decision. The Core Libraries Group has decided to sponsor the JSR-203 project. Thank you. iris [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2008-April/000332.html From Daniel.Fuchs at Sun.COM Mon Apr 28 15:32:35 2008 From: Daniel.Fuchs at Sun.COM (Daniel Fuchs) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:32:35 +0200 Subject: Vote results: JMX Group sponsorship of the Java VisualVM ,Troubleshooting Tool project PASSES Message-ID: <4815EE13.1060405@sun.com> Hi, The proposal for the JMX Group to sponsor the creation of the Java VisualVM, Troubleshooting Tool project [1] succeeds with 8 votes for and 0 votes against. In answer to the question "Should the JMX Group sponsor this Project?" the individual votes are: Daniel Fuchs yes Eamonn McManus yes Jean-Francois Denise yes Joel Feraud yes Luis-Miguel Alventosa yes Sandra Lions yes Shanliang Jiang yes Yves Joan yes [1] is: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2008-April/000019.html best regards, -- daniel http://blogs.sun.com/jmxetc From Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM Mon Apr 28 17:07:57 2008 From: Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM (Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:07:57 -0700 Subject: JDK 7 build 26 is available at the openjdk.java.net website Message-ID: <4816046D.2090609@Sun.COM> The OpenJDK source is available at: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 and the build 26 source is here: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/rev/613dea62de17 The OpenJDK source binary plugs and Jtreg binary for the promoted JDK 7 build 26 are available under the openjdk http://openjdk.java.net website under Source Code (direct link to bundles: http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7) Summary of changes: http://download.java.net/jdk7/changes/jdk7-b26.html -Xiomara From gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org Mon Apr 28 19:56:16 2008 From: gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org (Andrew John Hughes) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:56:16 +0100 Subject: JDK 7 build 26 is available at the openjdk.java.net website In-Reply-To: <4816046D.2090609@Sun.COM> References: <4816046D.2090609@Sun.COM> Message-ID: <17c6771e0804281256k768ab03ay56c93c715808fa32@mail.gmail.com> On 28/04/2008, Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com wrote: > > > The OpenJDK source is available at: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 > and the build 26 source is here: > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/rev/613dea62de17 > > The OpenJDK source binary plugs and Jtreg binary for the promoted JDK 7 > build 26 are available under the openjdk http://openjdk.java.net website > under Source Code (direct link to bundles: > http://download.java.net/openjdk/jdk7) > > Summary of changes: > http://download.java.net/jdk7/changes/jdk7-b26.html > > -Xiomara > Good to see this go in: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6649542 -- Andrew :-) Support Free Java! Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath http://openjdk.java.net PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA 7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8 From fw at deneb.enyo.de Tue Apr 29 08:23:23 2008 From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:23:23 +0200 Subject: New Project approved: More New I/O APIs for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <20080428232158.85C702C96A@callebaut.niobe.net> (Mark Reinhold's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:21:58 -0700") References: <20080428232158.85C702C96A@callebaut.niobe.net> Message-ID: <874p9lax38.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> * Mark Reinhold: > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio Is the JCP 203 draft available under an OpenJDK-compatible license? From mvyskocil at suse.cz Tue Apr 29 15:30:46 2008 From: mvyskocil at suse.cz (Michal Vyskocil) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:30:46 +0200 Subject: Symbol ``['' and a java.net.URI.create method Message-ID: <200804291730.46932.mvyskocil@suse.cz> Hi all, I'm working on adopting of jpackage project to openSUSE and got a problem with build of maven. The jpackage's folks have a script build-jar-repository, which symlinks the jar files in /usr/share/java to defined dir. My problem is, that the script produces a links in this form - /foo/bar/[ant].jar which later causes an IllegalArgumentException, because a java.net.URI.create dissallows ``[]'' in URI. The response from jpackage is, that java.net.URI.create has a bug, because symbol ``['' is valid in a Unix path. I'm testing several JRE implementations, but only gcj allows the ``[]'' in URI, other ones not. What do you think about? Is this really a bug in handling of unix filenames? Regards Michal Vyskocil From Christopher.Hegarty at Sun.COM Tue Apr 29 15:59:32 2008 From: Christopher.Hegarty at Sun.COM (Christopher Hegarty - Sun Microsystems Ireland) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:59:32 +0100 Subject: Symbol ``['' and a java.net.URI.create method In-Reply-To: <200804291730.46932.mvyskocil@suse.cz> References: <200804291730.46932.mvyskocil@suse.cz> Message-ID: <481745E4.8010406@Sun.COM> Since this is a question about java.net.URI I am moving this question to the OpenJDK Net Dev alias. I will try to answer it there. -Chris. Michal Vyskocil wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on adopting of jpackage project to openSUSE and got a problem with > build of maven. The jpackage's folks have a script build-jar-repository, > which symlinks the jar files in /usr/share/java to defined dir. > > My problem is, that the script produces a links in this > form - /foo/bar/[ant].jar which later causes an IllegalArgumentException, > because a java.net.URI.create dissallows ``[]'' in URI. The response from > jpackage is, that java.net.URI.create has a bug, because symbol ``['' is > valid in a Unix path. > > > I'm testing several JRE implementations, but only gcj allows the ``[]'' in > URI, other ones not. > > What do you think about? Is this really a bug in handling of unix filenames? > > Regards > Michal Vyskocil From Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM Tue Apr 29 16:15:33 2008 From: Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM (Alan Bateman) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:15:33 +0100 Subject: Symbol ``['' and a java.net.URI.create method In-Reply-To: <200804291730.46932.mvyskocil@suse.cz> References: <200804291730.46932.mvyskocil@suse.cz> Message-ID: <481749A5.7000606@sun.com> Michal Vyskocil wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on adopting of jpackage project to openSUSE and got a problem with > build of maven. The jpackage's folks have a script build-jar-repository, > which symlinks the jar files in /usr/share/java to defined dir. > > My problem is, that the script produces a links in this > form - /foo/bar/[ant].jar which later causes an IllegalArgumentException, > because a java.net.URI.create dissallows ``[]'' in URI. The response from > jpackage is, that java.net.URI.create has a bug, because symbol ``['' is > valid in a Unix path. > > > I'm testing several JRE implementations, but only gcj allows the ``[]'' in > URI, other ones not. > > What do you think about? Is this really a bug in handling of unix filenames? > > Rather than a java.net.URI bug, this is probably because the script or whatever that produces the URI isn't escaping the reserved characters ([] should be escaped to %5B%5D in this case). The best place to have further discussion about the URI class is the net-dev mailing list [1]. -Alan. [1] net-dev at openjdk.java.net From Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM Tue Apr 29 17:47:49 2008 From: Alan.Bateman at Sun.COM (Alan Bateman) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:47:49 +0100 Subject: New Project approved: More New I/O APIs for the Java Platform In-Reply-To: <874p9lax38.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <20080428232158.85C702C96A@callebaut.niobe.net> <874p9lax38.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Message-ID: <48175F45.8080502@sun.com> Florian Weimer wrote: > * Mark Reinhold: > > >> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio >> > > Is the JCP 203 draft available under an OpenJDK-compatible license? > The project was only setup yesterday so there isn't browsable javadoc there yet (sorry). So for now, you need to build the "docs" target. It would be best to follow-up to nio-discuss rather than the general discussion mailing list. -Alan. From Pete.Soper at Sun.COM Wed Apr 30 14:20:42 2008 From: Pete.Soper at Sun.COM (Pete Soper) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:20:42 -0400 Subject: NetBeans 6.1 groks Mercurial Message-ID: <4818803A.1020600@sun.com> It appears the new NetBeans version has a lot of support for Mercurial. The 6.1 release has been finished and is available here: http://netbeans.org -Pete