Back: Source tarballs
Xiomara Jayasena
Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM
Thu Feb 14 05:29:58 UTC 2008
Hi,
Due to popular demand, the source tarballs will be re-instituted.
Source tarballs will be posted for the next build posted on java.net
(build 25).
-Xiomara
Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/01/2008, *Xiomara Jayasena* <Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com
>> <mailto:Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes it is definitely being considered -- as it makes sense,
>>> especially if it is difficult for people to pull down the 7
>>> tar balls that currently exist now. There are a couple of
>>> ways to go about this so that will need to be sorted out.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> -Xiomara
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing something here, but surely it just takes
>>> someone at Sun to pull the b24 changeset using fclone, remove
>>> the hg metadata, tarball it and upload it to the site?
>>> This would be a lot simpler than pushing the Mercurial+forest
>>> extension requirement on to every downstream consumer.
>>
>> Thank you for your input!
>>
>> What you mentioned above is one way to do it. Although I do not
>> think Mercurial is needed to download the zips provided by
>> Mercurial itself.
>>
>> e.g.:
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jdk/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/corba/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jaxp/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/jaxws/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/hotspot/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/archive/jdk7-b24.zip
>> <http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7/langtools/archive/jdk7-b24.zip>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Xiomara :-)
>>
>>
>> --
>>> Andrew :-)
>>>
>>> Help end the Java Trap!
>>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>>> http://openjdk.java.net
>>
>>
>> Yes, I'm aware of the zips which is probably a slightly cleaner way
>> of doing the tarball than deleting the Mercurial metadata manually.
>> I actually find it quite astonishing that a tarball of a release was
>> just dropped and we are even having to debate this. It was probably
>> tricker
>> to roll a tarball from the internal Sun repositories so why it's not
>> being done just because the source repository is now available is
>> strange.
>> I don't know of any other FOSS project that doesn't have bother
>> available, at least for releases.
>
> There are a few options to get the source now ;-) unlike before. Many
> things have changed that have gotten us to the point of where we are
> -- that said nothing is final and we are flexible :-)
>
> -Xiomara
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Andrew :-)
>>
>> Help end the Java Trap!
>> Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
>> http://openjdk.java.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080213/4e1f5818/attachment.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list