Source tarballs
Andrew John Hughes
gnu_andrew at member.fsf.org
Fri Jan 4 12:34:27 UTC 2008
On 03/01/2008, Xiomara Jayasena <Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Happy New Year!
>
> Tom Marble wrote:
>
> I'd like to ask if we (Sun) can reconsider publishing one (1)
> source tarball for promoted builds.
>
>
> Yes it is definitely being considered -- as it makes sense, especially if
> it is difficult for people to pull down the 7 tar balls that currently exist
> now. There are a couple of ways to go about this so that will need to be
> sorted out.
>
> Best regards,
> -Xiomara
>
>
>
Maybe I'm missing something here, but surely it just takes someone at Sun to
pull the b24 changeset using fclone, remove the hg metadata, tarball it and
upload it to the site?
This would be a lot simpler than pushing the Mercurial+forest extension
requirement on to every downstream consumer.
--
Andrew :-)
Help end the Java Trap!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080104/e08402b8/attachment.html>
More information about the discuss
mailing list