Re: Forest Extension - Not to be found?

[neugens.limasoftware@gmail.com]

I will not have access to a computer until Monday, but you are right, we should update the docs if they are still pointing to the old requirement. I'll prepare a patch when I'm back on Monday if nobody else does it before me.

Mario
-- 
Sent from HTC Desire...

pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

http://www.icedrobot.org

Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/


----- Reply message -----
Da: "Uncle George" <openjdk at gatworks.com>
Data: ven, lug 1, 2011 23:29
Oggetto: Forest Extension - Not to be found?
A: <discuss at openjdk.java.net>

On 07/01/2011 04:51 PM, neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com wrote:
> orest were such a useful feature, sad they are depreciated in favour of the subrepos...
Can someone update the on-line DOC's to point/state to what is needed to 
build openJDK considering the demise of the forestry project.
> http://openjdk.java.net/guide/repositories.html#clone