Project Proposal: JDK 7 Update

[Dalibor Topic]

On 6/16/11 12:40 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> The JDK7 repositories would then become a dead end, right?

Yes.

> And the jdk7-update repos would become the new jdk7 development. 

Yes. For rationale going beyond the draft Q & A, please see Mark's post 
here: 

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2011-June/001932.html

> Are you planning to branch off a new forest for each jdk7 update release as
> well?

Yes. For rationale going beyond the draft Q & A, please see Georges' post 
here:

http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2011-June/001935.html

> Another related thing that I was thinking about today is that the
> website that shows the repositories could be improved to only show the
> toplevel repositories of each forest and have an expand button to make
> the subrepos visible. This way the mess would be a little easier to look
> at.

Does hgweb support that?

cheers,
dalibor topic
-- 
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 <tel:+494023646738> | Mobile: +491772664192 <tel:+491772664192>
Oracle Java Platform Group

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603

Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven

Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment