Suggestion: require release name in the approval request Subject line

Jeff Dinkins jeff.dinkins at oracle.com
Thu Nov 10 20:01:26 UTC 2011



> On 08:50 Wed 02 Nov     , Dan Smith wrote:
>> I'd appreciate something like this:
>> 
>> Subject: [7u2 CR] 7099XXX - Duke's nose is the wrong Pantone shade of red


Edvard, Dalibor: what needs to be done to make this official and put into practice?

thanks,

jeff


On Nov 7, 2011, at 3:31 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:

> On 08:50 Wed 02 Nov     , Dan Smith wrote:
>> I'd appreciate something like this:
>> 
>> Subject: [7u2 CR] 7099XXX - Duke's nose is the wrong Pantone shade of red
>> 
>> Right now I've got four different mail rules to try to filter out various review request subject lines; it's very ad hoc.  It's nice to separate these messages out, because they're typically much less likely to be of general interest.
>> 
> 
> I like this format better too.
> 
>> (Maybe there are also plans to move these off of the mailing lists entirely as we migrate to JIRA?)
>> 
> 
> Depends how this works out.  I wouldn't want to lose any transparency or archiving that the mailing lists provide.
> 
> A much bigger problem to me at the moment is the amount of commit traffic I get.  Can we not have these
> on a separate list?  I need to be signed up to the lists to get the actual patch reviews/discussion, but
> a commit to tl gives me about five identical e-mails.
> 
> I understand those on a particular team want to know what's gone in their repository, but surely this
> could be solved by having corresponding commit lists rather than dumping it all on the discussion list?
> 
>> —Dan
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew :)
> 
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> 
> Support Free Java!
> Contribute to GNU Classpath and IcedTea
> http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
> http://icedtea.classpath.org
> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07




More information about the discuss mailing list