Hacked OpenJDK

[Frans Thamura]

if this is openjdk a Community work , must :0

if they dont wanna to create binary.. the effort must be linked as
"respect" for community

i think people must start blog about this...

F



On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com> wrote:
> I would welcome that if Oracle were willing to at least link to my page,
> but...  that is ultimately there decision and a public discussion forum is
> perhaps not the best place to carry out this kind of discussion.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:
>>
>> that is the idea :0
>>
>> why openjdk is not create binary, and must under openscg
>>
>> and why dont bring openscg as commiter in openjdk for binary distribution
>>
>> F
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
>> wrote:
>> > OpenSCG's OpenJDK is "as is".   We compile the binaries according to the
>> > instructions that come with the source.  Then we build platform specific
>> > one-click installers around those binaries and offer them for free
>> > download.
>> >   We don't run the TCK tests and therfore our binaries are not
>> > "certified".
>> >
>> > Good folks from Sun and Oracle have never been anything but inquisitive
>> > &
>> > supportive of our efforts.
>> >
>> > --Luss
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> hi
>> >>
>> >> what is your positioning regarding your openjdk installer?
>> >>
>> >> http://www.openscg.org/se/openjdk/index.jsp
>> >>
>> >> do u modify it , or as is?
>> >>
>> >> F
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi Frans,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm NOT a lawyer and I don't work or speak for Oracle.
>> >> >
>> >> > I am an OpenJDK Packager, www.openscg.org, and therefore have some
>> >> > experience on this issue.
>> >> >
>> >> > I believe the spirit of the legaleeze on this is not necessarily
>> >> > evil.
>> >> >  :-)
>> >> > If what you build & distribute is different than OpenJDK, then don't
>> >> > call it
>> >> > "Java" and don't call it "OpenJDK".
>> >> >
>> >> > --Luss
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> hi there..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> if i use openjdk, and modify several code or API, and make it not
>> >> >> standard, and i am using for our own, and share across internet..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> will oracle sue me because this is not "openjdk" that release
>> >> >>
>> >> >> we know. that google, facebook, yahoo, twitter also using java, and
>> >> >> for a big company , that is "safer" they have their own skill , esp
>> >> >> java is their platform.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> we call it hacked openJDK.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> and in several case, they have team that manage the jdk, and several
>> >> >> can contribute, but several afraid, about "the sue".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> because this model will strengthen the OpenJDK, but how about the
>> >> >> JDK
>> >> >> for business?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> that is my idea.. any comment?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> F
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>