OpenJDK Binary

Lussier, Denis denisl at openscg.com
Fri Feb 10 20:18:04 UTC 2012


It is completely understandable (and very reasonable) that Oracle doesn't
presently elect to package commercial quality binaries of their General
Availability version of the GPL v2 OpenJDK.

IMHO this doesn't make them evil, it makes them smart.   They are
commercial organization first and a great champion (ans massive
contributor) of the open source java movement second.

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:

> i am joining your openscg. strange oracle want the binary outside openjdk
> :)
>
> let start promote openscg.
>
> i am glad my student can part of the packing program :)
>
> so people can start using openjdk for their work..
>
> but of course, that will be awesome if openscg can have link in openjdk
>
> NB: waiting oracle
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
> wrote:
> > I am confident that Oracle will not "sue" me.  I am a community member
> > acting in the open and in good faith.
> >
> > There really is no big secret to what OpenSCG does.   It is relatively
> > trivial to build the OpenJDK on Linux.    It's a bit tricky to build
> OpenJDK
> > on Windoze, but, I just followed the published instructions carefully and
> > did a little web searching when I ran into issues.
> >
> > Over the last couple years it has become easier to build the Windoze
> version
> > of OpenJDK (especically version 7 & 8).   For OpenJDK 6, I build the
> > binaries on Windows 2000 with an old version of Visual Studio to achieve
> > maximum compatibility with newer versions of Win32/Win64.
> >
> > --Luss
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> sorry
> >>
> >> can u share the how to , how to build and create all those binary, and
> >> i just think, your openscg.org as the "main" page for openjdk people
> >> to start. and will oracle sue you :)
> >>
> >> F
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
> wrote:
> >> > so what is the "politic" behind openjdk :0 if we cannot use it ;0 and
> >> > must do extra effort for this
> >> >
> >> > anyway, can you share your how to to the world , to use the openjdk
> >> > binary?
> >> >
> >> > F
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> I am NOT a lawyer or an Oracle Employee.  Here's my 2 cents below
> >> >>
> >> >> Oracle is NOT in the business of packaging OpenJDK for end user
> >> >> consumption.
> >> >>   They make their proprietary JDK's freely avaialble for all major
> >> >> platforms
> >> >> as long as you can live with their reasonable restrictions of their
> >> >> various
> >> >> license agreements.
> >> >>
> >> >> --Luss
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> hi all
> >> >>>
> >> >>> i got this
> >> >>>
> >> >>> http://openjdk.java.net/install/index.html
> >> >>>
> >> >>> for me this is "strange" open source project
> >> >>>
> >> >>> why we dont have a distribution for windows, mac... for openjdk?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> my feedback.. we should have those in main page.. but why there is
> no
> >> >>> build/binary?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> F
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >
> >
>



More information about the discuss mailing list