OpenJDK Binary

Frans Thamura frans at meruvian.org
Sat Feb 11 03:30:22 UTC 2012


who is we, and where do your position in this openjdk?

you are not oracle :)

F


On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Martijn Verburg
<martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Frans,
>
> We only just started discussing all of this at FOSDEM.  Some patience please
> :).
>
> We will begin by clearly linking in the various community efforts from the
> OpenJDK site and wiki.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
> On Saturday, 11 February 2012, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:
>> mmm :) raise up :
>>
>> henri with openjdk-osx-build in code.google.com
>> denis with openscg..
>>
>> i think binary is important, esp the j6, j7, and j8.. i beleive j7
>> will be forgotten :)
>>
>> but i think still a lot of people using j6, and life of time is shortly
>>
>> 1. there will be people pay for update to oracle.
>> 2. there will be people want community model regarding of the openjdk 6
>> patch..
>>
>> where is the community work, esp the umbrella?
>>
>>
>> martjin,
>> when will we get the binary?
>>
>> F
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> I package OpenJDK 7 for OSX for almost a year :
>>>
>>> http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/
>>>
>>> You could find there up to date OpenJDK7 for OSX (and even OpenJDK8
>>> for OSX with MLVM)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> 2012/2/10 Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>:
>>>> i am joining your openscg. strange oracle want the binary outside
>>>> openjdk :)
>>>>
>>>> let start promote openscg.
>>>>
>>>> i am glad my student can part of the packing program :)
>>>>
>>>> so people can start using openjdk for their work..
>>>>
>>>> but of course, that will be awesome if openscg can have link in openjdk
>>>>
>>>> NB: waiting oracle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I am confident that Oracle will not "sue" me.  I am a community member
>>>>> acting in the open and in good faith.
>>>>>
>>>>> There really is no big secret to what OpenSCG does.   It is relatively
>>>>> trivial to build the OpenJDK on Linux.    It's a bit tricky to build
>>>>> OpenJDK
>>>>> on Windoze, but, I just followed the published instructions carefully
>>>>> and
>>>>> did a little web searching when I ran into issues.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over the last couple years it has become easier to build the Windoze
>>>>> version
>>>>> of OpenJDK (especically version 7 & 8).   For OpenJDK 6, I build the
>>>>> binaries on Windows 2000 with an old version of Visual Studio to
>>>>> achieve
>>>>> maximum compatibility with newer versions of Win32/Win64.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Luss
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sorry
>>>>>>
>>>>>> can u share the how to , how to build and create all those binary, and
>>>>>> i just think, your openscg.org as the "main" page for openjdk people
>>>>>> to start. and will oracle sue you :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> F
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > so what is the "politic" behind openjdk :0 if we cannot use it ;0
>>>>>> > and
>>>>>> > must do extra effort for this
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > anyway, can you share your how to to the world , to use the openjdk
>>>>>> > binary?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > F
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> >> I am NOT a lawyer or an Oracle Employee.  Here's my 2 cents below
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Oracle is NOT in the business of packaging OpenJDK for end user
>>>>>> >> consumption.
>>>>>> >>   They make their proprietary JDK's freely avaialble for all major
>>>>>> >> platforms
>>>>>> >> as long as you can live with their reasonable restrictions of their
>>>>>> >> various
>>>>>> >> license agreements.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --Luss
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Frans Thamura
>>>>>> >> <frans at meruvian.org>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> hi all
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> i got this
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>



More information about the discuss mailing list