OpenJDK Binary

[John Pampuch]

"Grand Lord Admiral"... I think that title is just a matter of a rule change for the openJDK, right?

-John

Sent from my other location

On Feb 11, 2012, at 4:02 PM, Martijn Verburg <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:

> We == a bunch of OpenJDK hackers that were at FOSDEM, including some Oracle
> folks, linux distro folks (eg red hat, debian) and lots of independant
> hackers. I didn't exactly take a roll call.
> 
> My position?  Grand lord admiral, hmm no wait the bylaws probably don't
> allow that :-).
> 
> I'm just an enthusiastic amateur hacker who wants to see more Java
> developers get involved in the OpenJDK <shrug>.
> On Saturday, 11 February 2012, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:
>> who is we, and where do your position in this ope
>> you are not oracle :)
>> 
>> F
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Martijn Verburg
>> <martijnverburg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Frans,
>>> 
>>> We only just started discussing all of this at FOSDEM.  Some patience
> please
>>> :).
>>> 
>>> We will begin by clearly linking in the various community efforts from
> the
>>> OpenJDK site and wiki.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Martijn
>>> 
>>> On Saturday, 11 February 2012, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org> wrote:
>>>> mmm :) raise up :
>>>> 
>>>> henri with openjdk-osx-build in code.google.com
>>>> denis with openscg..
>>>> 
>>>> i think binary is important, esp the j6, j7, and j8.. i beleive j7
>>>> will be forgotten :)
>>>> 
>>>> but i think still a lot of people using j6, and life of time is shortly
>>>> 
>>>> 1. there will be people pay for update to oracle.
>>>> 2. there will be people want community model regarding of the openjdk 6
>>>> patch..
>>>> 
>>>> where is the community work, esp the umbrella?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> martjin,
>>>> when will we get the binary?
>>>> 
>>>> F
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I package OpenJDK 7 for OSX for almost a year :
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/openjdk-osx-build/
>>>>> 
>>>>> You could find there up to date OpenJDK7 for OSX (and even OpenJDK8
>>>>> for OSX with MLVM)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012/2/10 Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>:
>>>>>> i am joining your openscg. strange oracle want the binary outside
>>>>>> openjdk :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> let start promote openscg.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> i am glad my student can part of the packing program :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> so people can start using openjdk for their work..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> but of course, that will be awesome if openscg can have link in
> openjdk
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> NB: waiting oracle
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Lussier, Denis <denisl at openscg.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I am confident that Oracle will not "sue" me.  I am a community
> member
>>>>>>> acting in the open and in good faith.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> There really is no big secret to what OpenSCG does.   It is
> relatively
>>>>>>> trivial to build the OpenJDK on Linux.    It's a bit tricky to build
>>>>>>> OpenJDK
>>>>>>> on Windoze, but, I just followed the published instructions carefully
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> did a little web searching when I ran into issues.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Over the last couple years it has become easier to build the Windoze
>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>> of OpenJDK (especically version 7 & 8).   For OpenJDK 6, I build the
>>>>>>> binaries on Windows 2000 with an old version of Visual Studio to
>>>>>>> achieve
>>>>>>> maximum compatibility with newer versions of Win32/Win64.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --Luss
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Frans Thamura <frans at meruvian.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> sorry
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> can u share the how to , how to build and create all those binary,
> and
>>>>>>>> i just think, your openscg.org as the "main" page for openjdk people
>>>>>>>> to start. and will oracle sue you :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>