Source code mapping to projects
martijnverburg at gmail.com
Fri May 4 15:02:13 UTC 2012
Thanks for the response, we'll put that coarse grained split in place.
On 4 May 2012 15:58, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 15:21, Martijn Verburg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> As part of the plan to pre-review low hanging fruit for the OpenJDK
>> (such as coinification, javac warnings and the like). One of the
>> challenges is to split the patches into the appropriate groups (2d,
>> core-lib etc) and then a per class basis for easy review.
>> Is there a rough mapping outlined of OpenJDK source code to groups?
> Most of the group pages (http://openjdk.java.net/groups/<group>) have a list
> of APIs and/or source directories for the group. However for the refactoring
> changes that you are talking about, warnings, coinification, etc. then
> slicing and dicing to that level of granularity should not be needed; the
> code review and sponsorship overhead will be more than the actual work. That
> said, the core and client changes have different integration forests and it
> does make things a bit easier (integrators doing merging in particular) if
> you can do a very coarse grain split into core and client. When I say client
> then I mean AWT, 2D, Swing and related areas. When I say "core" I mostly
> mean headless (libraries, security, networking, ..). In recent times this
> relatively coarse grain split has worked well.
More information about the discuss