From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Tue Dec 3 12:44:05 2013 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:44:05 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Windows In-Reply-To: <52999816.80606@orange.fr> References: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> <5298BB51.6060702@oracle.com> <52999816.80606@orange.fr> Message-ID: <529DD215.6060109@oracle.com> On 11/30/13 8:47 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote: > So, by specilizing a group on windows, That's not a great idea because a) a Build Group already exists b) Groups are generic, Projects are specific cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From artem.ananiev at oracle.com Tue Dec 3 13:15:17 2013 From: artem.ananiev at oracle.com (Artem Ananiev) Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 17:15:17 +0400 Subject: Group Proposal: Windows In-Reply-To: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> References: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> Message-ID: <529DD965.3080008@oracle.com> On 11/29/2013 10:10 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote: > Hi > > I am not a OpenJDK member and as such, cannot propose the creation of a > new group. But may be someone among the OpenJDK members would be > interested in proposing such group. > > 1/ Motivation > The essential motivation is to support windows as a major platform in > all directions sustained by the OpenJDK ecosystem. > > 2/ Goal > This group is more a recipe for people interested in improving the > know-how of building, testing, running, debugging, documenting the > releases of OpenJDk with a focus on the Windows build system and the > Windows jtreg system at the same level of other platforms. Special > effort should concentrate in the update of the current specific building > hotspot MSVC component jvm.vxproj so that it would be in sync with the > "new" configuration system started in jdk8. As other people have already noticed, all of the above (building, testing, running, etc.) is already covered by other groups, and/or projects, or on the wiki. However, if the Windows group is about support of new versions of the Windows OS family, leveraging Windows-specific features to make JDK smaller/faster/secure/etc., deeper integration with the Windows platform (not sure about this one, because Java has always been considered cross-platform, we don't support platform-specific APIs much) - in that case such a group would be useful. Thanks, Artem > I am not sure about the differentiation between group and project, but > the group concept seem to me more appropriate since windows is already > part of the hotspot as an os subpart > > > Anyone interested? > > Francis > > > > From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 14:20:00 2013 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:20:00 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Adoption Message-ID: <529F3A10.7030505@oracle.com> I would like to invite discussion on a proposal for a new OpenJDK Group: Adoption. I have been following the work of the Adopt OpenJDK Community [6] for the past couple of years, and have been impressed by the infectious enthusiasm in the community for improving the JDK. I believe that such an effort should be embedded in the OpenJDK Community itself, and so I would like to propose the creation of a new OpenJDK Group: Adoption. This Group would bundle and aid efforts to collaborate on OpenJDK Projects, lower the barriers to contribution, and bring JDK development into the heart of the Java community. For the initial Group Members I would like to suggest: * Martijn Verburg [0] * Steve Poole [1] * Rory O'Donnel [2] * Daniel Bryant [3] * Mani Sarkar [4] * Edward Yue Shung Wong [5] * Mario Torre [7] * Ben Evans [9] with myself, Dalibor Topi? [8], as the Group Lead. I would look forward to bootstrapping this first new OpenJDK Group since the ratification of the OpenJDK Bylaws, having initiated the first new OpenJDK Group, the Porters Group, back in 2007 [10]. If this proposal is accepted, I intend to serve as Group Lead for the Adoption Group until the Group Members chose to replace me with a suitable candidate. cheers, dalibor topi? [0] Martijn Verburg has been heavily involved in Open Source and Java communities for the past 15 years. He has lead several Open Source projects (e.g. PCGen, Ikasan) and is a regular speaker and author on Java and Open Source topics. He currently co-leads the London Java Community (LJC), which in 2011 founded the global Adopt OpenJDK programme whose purpose is to advocate OpenJDK to the broader Java Community, run workshops / test fests and to produce tools that help on-board new OpenJDK Contributors. Martijn was recognized as a Java Champion in 2012 in part for Adopt OpenJDK and other Java/Open Source community contributions. [1] Steve Poole has been a long time IBM Java developer, leader and evangelist, working on IBM Java SDKs and JVM's since Java was less than 1. In the years since he's had time to work on other things including representing IBM on various JSRs, being a Committer on Eclipse and Apache projects and even speaking at a conference or two. He's a committer on the OpenJDK PowerPC/AIX port and is currently IBM's OpenJDK Technical lead. He's a strong supporter of the Adopt OpenJDK program and has been helping organise and initiate workshops, testfests etc world wide. [2] Rory O'Donnell has been involved with Software Quality for the past 20 years, he has been working on Java Quality for some 12 years while his focus for the last two years has been firmly on OpenJDK Quality. He has hosted technical events in London and St.Petersburg , working with the local Java User Groups to deliver TechFests. He organised the creation of TestFest Videos and the sharing of these videos with the worldwide community. He is an avid supporter of the Adopt OpenJDK program. [3] Daniel Bryant has participated in many open-source projects over the past 10 years, and is currently a core contributor (and self-proclaimed evangelist) for the Adopt OpenJDK Betterrev project. He has a passion for sharing his knowledge via blog posts, articles for well known technology websites and conference presentations (including promoting OpenJDK and Betterrev at JavaOne and Devoxx in 2013!). Daniel is an active member in the London Java Community (LJC), and sits on the LJC JCP committee, participates in the meet-a-mentor program and assists in running hack days. He also enjoys experimenting with practical implementations of Artificial Intelligence, having gained a PhD in this field during his misspent youth as an academic. [4] Mani Sarkar is a passionate Java/JVM developer currently living and working in London, UK for a data analytics Bright North. Mani is one of the LJC Leaders and is responsible for social media and other aspects of advocacy for the Adopt OpenJDK programme. Mani is a JCP Member, OpenJDK Contributor (recently having submitted a number of patches). [5] Edward Yue Shung Wong was bitten by the coding bug since starting at Imperial College London, reading a Masters in Joint Mathematics & Computer Science. Since graduating he has dabbled in many different technologies and Java is by far a favourite. Edward has been a member of the Adopt OpenJDK project since early 2012 and has helped out in workshops/test fests on OpenJDK. Throughout 2013 Edward has been a core contributing to the BetterRev project; working to make contributing to OpenJDK easier for the GitHub generation. [6] https://java.net/projects/adoptopenjdk/pages/AdoptOpenJDK [7] Hacker for fun and freedom, free software enthusiast, musician and incurable romantic, Mario has served few key FLOSS projects like GNU Classpath and OpenJDK and is co-author of the Caciocavallo project. He has a strong interest in Computer Graphics and Human - Machine interaction and User Interface design. Currently works as a Senior Software Engineer for Red Hat on Thermostat, a monitoring platform for OpenJDK and OpenJDK itself and its Community as an OpenJDK and Free Software advocate. [8] Dalibor Topi? lives in Hamburg, Germany, and works as Principal Product Manager for Oracle. He is an OpenJDK Member, Group Lead for the Porters Group, and Project Lead for the JDK 7 Updates Project in the OpenJDK Community. [9] Ben Evans has been a Java developer since 1998, and a F/OSS developer since 1995. He has participated in and led many Open Source projects and is a well-known author and speaker. He represents the London Java Community on the Java Community Process Executive Committee and has served on several Expert Groups. He helps to organise technical events ranging from small hack sessions to international conferences. Ben is a Java Champion and JavaOne Rockstar speaker. [10] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/000023.html -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com Wed Dec 4 18:04:07 2013 From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:04:07 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: Yes, Cheers, Mario 2013/12/4 Se?n Coffey > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote > -- pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF IcedRobot: www.icedrobot.org Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/ Read About us at: http://planet.classpath.org OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/ Please, support open standards: http://endsoftpatents.org/ From omajid at redhat.com Wed Dec 4 18:08:29 2013 From: omajid at redhat.com (Omair Majid) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:08:29 -0500 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20131204180829.GD1993@redhat.com> Hi, * Se?n Coffey [2013-12-04 13:01]: > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. This isn't a vote; I am curious about what these roles mean for an update project. Specifically, since the project lead (or a delegate) reviews patches, what is the point of the reviewer role? From what I have seen, the patch being proposed for backport is already reviewed before the original commit to jdkN. Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 From roger.riggs at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 18:45:31 2013 From: roger.riggs at oracle.com (roger riggs) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:45:31 -0500 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529F784B.9090506@oracle.com> Vote: Yes On 12/4/2013 12:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. From anthony.petrov at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 18:49:21 2013 From: anthony.petrov at oracle.com (Anthony Petrov) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:49:21 +0400 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529F7931.7040209@oracle.com> Vote: YES -- best regards, Anthony On 12/04/2013 09:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From sean.coffey at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 18:59:12 2013 From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?B?U2XDoW4gQ29mZmV5?=) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:59:12 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <20131204180829.GD1993@redhat.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> <20131204180829.GD1993@redhat.com> Message-ID: <529F7B80.9080001@oracle.com> On 04/12/2013 18:08, Omair Majid wrote: > Hi, > > * Se?n Coffey [2013-12-04 13:01]: >> The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a >> role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed >> at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will >> be granted in this Project. > This isn't a vote; I am curious about what these roles mean for an > update project. > > Specifically, since the project lead (or a delegate) reviews patches, > what is the point of the reviewer role? From what I have seen, the patch > being proposed for backport is already reviewed before the original > commit to jdkN. Omair, The project lead or maintainers are not necessarily Reviewers. In the JDK 7u Project, an official OpenJDK Reviewer is required on all code fixes. Keep in mind also that not all backports apply cleanly and separate code reviews have been required. There's also the case of fixes which were not applicable to JDK 8. This is all documented on the JDK 7u Project page : http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/codereview.html regards, Sean. > > Thanks, > Omair > From joe.darcy at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 19:05:36 2013 From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (Joe Darcy) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 11:05:36 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529F7D00.2070301@oracle.com> Vote: yes -Joe On 12/04/2013 09:34 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 19:06:18 2013 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 20:06:18 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529F7D2A.90708@oracle.com> Vote: Yes! Finally ;) On 12/4/13 6:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From Lance.Andersen at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 21:00:46 2013 From: Lance.Andersen at oracle.com (Lance Andersen - Oracle) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 16:00:46 -0500 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F7D2A.90708@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> <529F7D2A.90708@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1E851551-C4EA-413E-AF1A-95A9A8960C97@oracle.com> vote: Yes On Dec 4, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > Vote: Yes! > > Finally ;) > > On 12/4/13 6:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: >> I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me >> as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment -------------- next part -------------- Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037 Oracle Java Engineering 1 Network Drive Burlington, MA 01803 Lance.Andersen at oracle.com From chris.hegarty at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 21:01:47 2013 From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:01:47 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <350EBD1A-3681-4129-92B4-D78BA5E663DA@oracle.com> Vote: YES -Chris > On 4 Dec 2013, at 17:34, Se?n Coffey wrote: > > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From mark.reinhold at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 21:30:45 2013 From: mark.reinhold at oracle.com (mark.reinhold at oracle.com) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:30:45 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20131204133045.98432@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Vote: yes - Mark From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 21:49:37 2013 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 13:49:37 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529FA371.3010200@oracle.com> Vote: yes From laurent.daynes at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 21:54:27 2013 From: laurent.daynes at oracle.com (Laurent Daynes) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:54:27 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529FA493.6010602@oracle.com> vote: Yes On 12/4/13 6:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From karen.kinnear at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 22:16:54 2013 From: karen.kinnear at oracle.com (Karen Kinnear) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 17:16:54 -0500 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <12023E17-DE10-4181-BB0F-26DE9D227499@oracle.com> vote: yes On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From Peter.B.Kessler at Oracle.COM Wed Dec 4 22:18:46 2013 From: Peter.B.Kessler at Oracle.COM (Peter B. Kessler) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 14:18:46 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529FAA46.7010902@Oracle.COM> Vote: yes. ... peter On 12/04/13 09:34, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > .... From david.katleman at oracle.com Wed Dec 4 23:26:01 2013 From: david.katleman at oracle.com (David Katleman) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:26:01 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <529FBA09.8000708@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 12/4/2013 9:34 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From roman at kennke.org Thu Dec 5 08:48:28 2013 From: roman at kennke.org (Roman Kennke) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:48:28 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529FBA09.8000708@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> <529FBA09.8000708@oracle.com> Message-ID: <1386233308.3490.74.camel@localhost> Vote: yes Am Mittwoch, den 04.12.2013, 15:26 -0800 schrieb David Katleman: > Vote: yes > > > On 12/4/2013 9:34 AM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > > Process [3]. > > > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > > be granted in this Project. > > > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > > > Regards, > > Sean. > > > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote > > From artem.ananiev at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 09:09:56 2013 From: artem.ananiev at oracle.com (Artem Ananiev) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:09:56 +0400 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A042E4.6000805@oracle.com> Vote: yes Artem On 12/4/2013 9:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 09:41:40 2013 From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:41:40 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A04A54.2070003@oracle.com> Vote: yes From ivan at azulsystems.com Thu Dec 5 15:05:26 2013 From: ivan at azulsystems.com (Ivan Krylov) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:05:26 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: Vote: yes. Ivan On Dec 4, 2013, at 9:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From mandy.chung at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 15:21:46 2013 From: mandy.chung at oracle.com (Mandy Chung) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:21:46 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A09A0A.80501@oracle.com> Vote: yes From jeff.dinkins at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 15:23:57 2013 From: jeff.dinkins at oracle.com (Jeff Dinkins) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:23:57 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <350EBD1A-3681-4129-92B4-D78BA5E663DA@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> <350EBD1A-3681-4129-92B4-D78BA5E663DA@oracle.com> Message-ID: <84F16AEF-D85A-4775-B68A-9BDC30D77D23@oracle.com> Vote: YES -jeff > On 4 Dec 2013, at 17:34, Se?n Coffey wrote: > > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From omajid at redhat.com Thu Dec 5 19:51:37 2013 From: omajid at redhat.com (Omair Majid) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:51:37 -0500 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <20131205195137.GD19634@redhat.com> Vote: Yes * Se?n Coffey [2013-12-04 13:01]: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. Omair -- PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 From daniel.fuchs at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 20:18:11 2013 From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com (Daniel Fuchs) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 21:18:11 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A0DF83.50206@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 12/4/13 6:34 PM, Se?n Coffey wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the "JDK 8 Updates" Project with me > as the Lead and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce JDK 8 Updates on top of > the JDK 8 Project [1]. > > I've been involved as a maintainer in the JDK 7u Project [2] since > May 2012 and have gained a good grasp of all aspects to > managing a JDK Updates Project. I work as an engineer in the Oracle > Java SE Sustaining team where JDK updates are a core piece of > infrastructure for delivering bug fixes to end users. > > The Project will follow a similar process to that of the JDK 7u > Project. The Project's repositories will initially be open for > bug fixes and small enhancements only. Features and major changes > for the release will be proposed and tracked via the existing JEP > Process [3]. > > The initial Authors/Committers/Reviewers will be anyone who holds a > role in the JDK 8, JDK 7u, HSX, or Nashorn Projects and has contributed > at least one changeset. The most senior role across those Projects will > be granted in this Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 18th December 2013. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > Regards, > Sean. > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk8/ > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/ > [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From John.Coomes at oracle.com Thu Dec 5 21:28:38 2013 From: John.Coomes at oracle.com (John Coomes) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:28:38 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <21152.61446.159820.793138@oracle.com> Vote: yes -John From jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com Fri Dec 6 06:51:37 2013 From: jaroslav.bachorik at oracle.com (Jaroslav Bachorik) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 07:51:37 +0100 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <21152.61446.159820.793138@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> <21152.61446.159820.793138@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A173F9.3020709@oracle.com> Vote: YES -JB- From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com Fri Dec 6 07:34:33 2013 From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu) Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:34:33 +0900 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A17E09.6080902@oracle.com> Vote: yes Masayoshi From iris.clark at oracle.com Fri Dec 6 17:57:51 2013 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 09:57:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 8 Updates (jdk8u) In-Reply-To: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> References: <529F67A6.80007@oracle.com> Message-ID: <35eceb72-01e6-4df4-8d7a-30af63ba172a@default> Vote: yes iris From dalibor.topic at oracle.com Wed Dec 11 20:20:38 2013 From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:20:38 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Adoption In-Reply-To: <529F3A10.7030505@oracle.com> References: <529F3A10.7030505@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A8C916.3060900@oracle.com> On 12/4/13 3:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > I would like to invite discussion on a proposal for a new OpenJDK Group: Adoption. Since there was no apparent need for further discussion within a week from the Proposal being made, I'll move this Proposal along to Step 1, as outlined at the guide for proposing new Groups. [0] cheers, dalibor topic [0] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/#new-group -- Oracle Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher Green Oracle Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment From denisl at openscg.com Wed Dec 11 21:23:13 2013 From: denisl at openscg.com (Lussier, Denis) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:23:13 -0500 Subject: Group Proposal: Adoption In-Reply-To: <52A8C916.3060900@oracle.com> References: <529F3A10.7030505@oracle.com> <52A8C916.3060900@oracle.com> Message-ID: Great stuff!! I am anxious to talk about encouraging OpenJDK adoption in the Windoze space once the group gets going. --Luss On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > On 12/4/13 3:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > > I would like to invite discussion on a proposal for a new OpenJDK Group: > Adoption. > > Since there was no apparent need for further discussion within a week from > the Proposal being made, I'll move this Proposal along to Step 1, as > outlined at the guide for proposing new Groups. [0] > > cheers, > dalibor topic > > [0] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/#new-group > -- > Oracle > Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 +491737185961> > Oracle Java Platform Group > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen > Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz > > Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > Green Oracle Oracle is committed to > developing practices and products that help protect the environment > From francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr Thu Dec 12 06:54:45 2013 From: francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr (Francis ANDRE) Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:54:45 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Adoption In-Reply-To: References: <529F3A10.7030505@oracle.com> <52A8C916.3060900@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52A95DB5.8040809@orange.fr> Luss You are welcome on the windoze side! Francis Le 11/12/2013 22:23, Lussier, Denis a ?crit : > Great stuff!! I am anxious to talk about encouraging OpenJDK adoption in > the Windoze space once the group gets going. > > --Luss > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: > >> On 12/4/13 3:20 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote: >>> I would like to invite discussion on a proposal for a new OpenJDK Group: >> Adoption. >> >> Since there was no apparent need for further discussion within a week from >> the Proposal being made, I'll move this Proposal along to Step 1, as >> outlined at the guide for proposing new Groups. [0] >> >> cheers, >> dalibor topic >> >> [0] http://openjdk.java.net/groups/#new-group >> -- >> Oracle >> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager >> Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961 > +491737185961> >> Oracle Java Platform Group >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg >> >> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG >> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen >> Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: J?rgen Kunz >> >> Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. >> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande >> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 >> Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher >> >> Green Oracle Oracle is committed to >> developing practices and products that help protect the environment >>