From aph at redhat.com Fri Nov 1 09:06:23 2013 From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley) Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:06:23 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 9 In-Reply-To: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <52736F0F.3060601@redhat.com> On 10/30/2013 10:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 9 Project, with me as the Lead > and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group. vote: yes From vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com Fri Nov 1 11:08:58 2013 From: vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com (Vincent Ryan) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 11:08:58 +0000 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 9 In-Reply-To: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Vote: yes -Vinnie On 30 Oct 2013, at 22:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 9 Project, with me as the Lead > and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference > implementation of the Java SE 9 Platform, which will be specified in a > corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process. > > The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and > small enhancements only. Features for the release will be proposed > and tracked via the existing JEP Process [1]. > > Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 8 > Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 8 will > be granted the same role in the JDK 9 Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 13 November [3]. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > - Mark > > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8 > [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+9+CFV&iso=20131113T2359 > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Fri Nov 1 22:05:24 2013 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:05:24 -0700 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 9 In-Reply-To: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <527425A4.6070409@oracle.com> Vote: yes On 10/30/2013 03:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote: > I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 9 Project, with me as the Lead > and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group. > > The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference > implementation of the Java SE 9 Platform, which will be specified in a > corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process. > > The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and > small enhancements only. Features for the release will be proposed > and tracked via the existing JEP Process [1]. > > Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 8 > Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 8 will > be granted the same role in the JDK 9 Project. > > Votes are due by 23:59 UTC on Wednesday, 13 November [3]. > > Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion. > Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this > message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header. > > For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5]. > > - Mark > > > [1] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps > [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk8 > [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+9+CFV&iso=20131113T2359 > [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members > [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote From serkanozal86 at hotmail.com Sat Nov 2 19:18:27 2013 From: serkanozal86 at hotmail.com (=?windows-1254?B?c2Vya2FuIPZ6YWw=?=) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 21:18:27 +0200 Subject: Preventing Class Definitions from Compacting At GC Cycle Message-ID: Hi all, I am not sure that target of mail is this group or not but I don't know better one for asking :) I am currently working on an OffHeap solution and I have a problem with "Compact" phase of GC.As I see at "Compact" phase, location of classes these not loaded by bootloader may be changed. However, location of classes these loaded by bootloader (classloaders are null) are not changed.Changing memory location of class definition fails my OffHeap solution. Compacting can be disabled by VM arguments but I don't want to use these arguments. Because disabling compaction for all objects causes increasing of fragmentation. In addition, I tried class pinning with JNI by "NewGlobalRef" method but it doesn't prevent compacting. As I understood, it only hides object from garbage collected. In brief, is there any way to prevent compacting of any specific class defition (or object) at GC cycle?Is there any bit, offset or field (such as mark_oop) in object header to prevent compacting of fully from GC for any specific object or class? Thanks in advance. -- Serkan ?ZAL From John.Coomes at oracle.com Wed Nov 6 18:46:25 2013 From: John.Coomes at oracle.com (John Coomes) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:46:25 -0800 Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 9 In-Reply-To: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: <21114.36481.19691.395124@oracle.com> Vote: yes -John From iris.clark at oracle.com Fri Nov 8 16:46:42 2013 From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark) Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 08:46:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 9 In-Reply-To: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> References: <20131030153020.274677@eggemoggin.niobe.net> Message-ID: Vote: yes iris From nagappan at gmail.com Wed Nov 13 06:29:16 2013 From: nagappan at gmail.com (Nagappan Alagappan) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:29:16 -0800 Subject: [Ann] Cobra 4.0 - Windows GUI test automation tool Message-ID: Hello, New API: * selectrow * doubleclickrowindex * comboselectindex * multiselect * multiremove Bug fixes: * Select child row based on tree item, rather than tree * Fix callback to be registered just once * Convert all strings to utf-8 * Change port number to listen from command line Python client: * 3.x fixes Java client: * Updated compatible APIs and docs Example: * New example added for automating Windows app Credit: Nagappan Alagappan John Yingjun Li Jia Liu Andrew, Rob (LDTP forum) Major Silence (https://github.com/majorsilence/ldtp2) VMware colleagues Please spread the word and also share your feedback with us (email me: nagappan at gmail.com). About LDTP: Cross Platform GUI test automation tool Linux version is LDTP, Windows version is Cobra and Mac version is PyATOM. * Linux version is known to work on GNOME / KDE (QT >= 4.8) / Java Swing / LibreOffice / Mozilla application on all major Linux distribution * Windows version is known to work on application written in .NET / C++ / Java / QT on Windows XP SP3 / Vista SP2 / Windows 7 SP1 / Windows 8. * Mac version is known to work on OS X Snow Leopard /Lion/Mountain Lion/Maverick. Where ever PyATOM runs, LDTP should work on it. Tests can be written in: Python/Ruby/Perl/Java/C#/Clojure/VB.NET/PowerShell Download source: https://github.com/ldtp/cobra Download binary (Windows XP / Vista / Windows 7 / Windows 8): https://code.google.com/p/cobra-winldtp/downloads/list System requirement: .NET 3.5, refer README.txt after installation Documentation references: For detailed information on LDTP framework and latest updates visit http://ldtp.freedesktop.org For information on various APIs in LDTP including those added for this release can be got from http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/user-doc/index.html Java doc - http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/javadoc/ Report bugs - http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki/Bugs To subscribe to LDTP mailing lists, visit http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki/Mailing_list/ Thanks Nagappan -- Cross platform GUI testing Linux Desktop (GUI Application) Testing Project - http://ldtp.freedesktop.org Cobra - Windows GUI Automation tool - https://github.com/ldtp/cobra ATOMac - Mac GUI Automation tool - https://github.com/pyatom/pyatom http://nagappanal.blogspot.com From devnexen at gmail.com Fri Nov 22 21:32:27 2013 From: devnexen at gmail.com (DEV Nexen) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 21:32:27 +0000 Subject: Presentation Message-ID: Hello everybody, I am David Carlier and I m willing to join the OpenJDK community to contribute. So basically, I am C/C++ software engineer and have small contribution Open Source contribution (Bind10 actually) and would like to work on some topics (like FreeBSD one or anything else ... will see). Kind regards. From benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com Sat Nov 23 11:34:15 2013 From: benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com (Ben Evans) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 11:34:15 +0000 Subject: Presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi David, You'd be very welcome in the AdoptOpenJDK community. We are always keen for new members - and I know that we have a number of members who would be very keen to learn more C/C++ to help with our work with OpenJDK, if you'd be willing to share your knowledge. Thanks, Ben On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:32 PM, DEV Nexen wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I am David Carlier and I m willing to join the OpenJDK community to > contribute. > So basically, I am C/C++ software engineer and have small contribution Open > Source contribution (Bind10 actually) and would like to work on some topics > (like FreeBSD one or anything else ... will see). > > Kind regards. > From devnexen at gmail.com Sat Nov 23 11:53:54 2013 From: devnexen at gmail.com (DEV Nexen) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 11:53:54 +0000 Subject: Presentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi and thanks for your kind message. Yes I ll do my best above all ... as another person suggested me, I may start by dtrace support. Kindest regards. David On 23 November 2013 11:34, Ben Evans wrote: > Hi David, > > You'd be very welcome in the AdoptOpenJDK community. We are always keen > for new members - and I know that we have a number of members who would be > very keen to learn more C/C++ to help with our work with OpenJDK, if you'd > be willing to share your knowledge. > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:32 PM, DEV Nexen wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> I am David Carlier and I m willing to join the OpenJDK community to >> contribute. >> So basically, I am C/C++ software engineer and have small contribution >> Open >> Source contribution (Bind10 actually) and would like to work on some >> topics >> (like FreeBSD one or anything else ... will see). >> >> Kind regards. >> > > From francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr Fri Nov 29 06:10:10 2013 From: francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr (Francis ANDRE) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:10:10 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Windows Message-ID: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> Hi I am not a OpenJDK member and as such, cannot propose the creation of a new group. But may be someone among the OpenJDK members would be interested in proposing such group. 1/ Motivation The essential motivation is to support windows as a major platform in all directions sustained by the OpenJDK ecosystem. 2/ Goal This group is more a recipe for people interested in improving the know-how of building, testing, running, debugging, documenting the releases of OpenJDk with a focus on the Windows build system and the Windows jtreg system at the same level of other platforms. Special effort should concentrate in the update of the current specific building hotspot MSVC component jvm.vxproj so that it would be in sync with the "new" configuration system started in jdk8. I am not sure about the differentiation between group and project, but the group concept seem to me more appropriate since windows is already part of the hotspot as an os subpart Anyone interested? Francis From neugens at redhat.com Fri Nov 29 14:55:46 2013 From: neugens at redhat.com (Mario Torre) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 15:55:46 +0100 Subject: [REMINDER]: Deadline for FOSDEM 2014 FreeJava DevRoom presentations... Message-ID: <1385736946.3787.24.camel@galactica.localdomain> ...is tomorrow :) https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/java-devroom/2013-October/000042.html Cheers, Mario From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com Fri Nov 29 16:05:37 2013 From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:05:37 -0800 Subject: Group Proposal: Windows In-Reply-To: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> References: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> Message-ID: <5298BB51.6060702@oracle.com> On 11/28/2013 10:10 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote: > Hi > > I am not a OpenJDK member and as such, cannot propose the creation of > a new group. But may be someone among the OpenJDK members would be > interested in proposing such group. > > 1/ Motivation > The essential motivation is to support windows as a major platform in > all directions sustained by the OpenJDK ecosystem. > > 2/ Goal > This group is more a recipe for people interested in improving the > know-how of building, testing, running, debugging, documenting the > releases of OpenJDk with a focus on the Windows build system and the > Windows jtreg system at the same level of other platforms. Special > effort should concentrate in the update of the current specific > building hotspot MSVC component jvm.vxproj so that it would be in sync > with the "new" configuration system started in jdk8. > > I am not sure about the differentiation between group and project, but > the group concept seem to me more appropriate since windows is already > part of the hotspot as an os subpart > > > Anyone interested? > > Francis > > > > Francis, For info on groups and projects, see: http://openjdk.java.net/groups/ http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ If you have problems with using the build system on Windows, or using jtreg on Windows, then I think you are better to take that up with the appropriate folk on existing aliases, such as found here http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/ http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jtreg -- Jon From francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr Sat Nov 30 07:47:34 2013 From: francis.andre.kampbell at orange.fr (Francis ANDRE) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 08:47:34 +0100 Subject: Group Proposal: Windows In-Reply-To: <5298BB51.6060702@oracle.com> References: <52982FC2.2060108@orange.fr> <5298BB51.6060702@oracle.com> Message-ID: <52999816.80606@orange.fr> Jon Le 29/11/2013 17:05, Jonathan Gibbons a ?crit : > On 11/28/2013 10:10 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote: >> Hi >> >> I am not a OpenJDK member and as such, cannot propose the creation of a new >> group. But may be someone among the OpenJDK members would be interested in >> proposing such group. >> >> 1/ Motivation >> The essential motivation is to support windows as a major platform in all >> directions sustained by the OpenJDK ecosystem. >> >> 2/ Goal >> This group is more a recipe for people interested in improving the know-how >> of building, testing, running, debugging, documenting the releases of OpenJDk >> with a focus on the Windows build system and the Windows jtreg system at the >> same level of other platforms. Special effort should concentrate in the >> update of the current specific building hotspot MSVC component jvm.vxproj so >> that it would be in sync with the "new" configuration system started in jdk8. >> >> I am not sure about the differentiation between group and project, but the >> group concept seem to me more appropriate since windows is already part of >> the hotspot as an os subpart >> >> >> Anyone interested? >> >> Francis >> >> >> >> > > Francis, > > For info on groups and projects, see: > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/ > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/ > > If you have problems with using the build system on Windows, or using jtreg on > Windows, then I think you are better to take that up with the appropriate folk > on existing aliases, such as found here > http://openjdk.java.net/groups/build/ > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/code-tools/jtreg > Even if I have yet problems using the build system on Windows in jdk7 and jdk8, specially for the hotspot build, this proposal is more a reaction to the following answers found in the thread build/Le roi est mort, vive le roi! >>The top level make produces a full jdk here : Z:\JDK\jdk8\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\images\j2sdk-image >>The hotspot make produces a full jdk here : Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\windows\jdk-windows-i586 >>The hotspot create.bat produces a JVM here: Z:\JDK\jdk8\hotspot\build\vs-i486\compiler1 >>The visual studio projects are not the official way to build hotspot. They are provided as a nice-to-have feature that developers on windows >>maintain. The official way to build on all platforms is to use the makefiles. >>Most developers don't use create.bat or the vs projects. So, by specilizing a group on windows, I would think to attract more developers on this major platform to improve it and with the help of everybody fix the issues around the new build system and the create.bat stuff. Since now that jtreg is working on windows, one could choose it for its day-by-day development instead of using a linux box (I am not saying windows is better than linux or vice versa, but just that everyone should have the choice to use the platform he fills comfortable) . Up to now, IMO, windows is not at the same level as Linux or Solaris. Francis > -- Jon >