CFV: New Project Kulla

[Brian Goetz]

> Yes, and although discussion before proposal is not mandatory, a project of
> this scale (and importance) should have been discussed a bit in advance I
> think.

I think you are vastly overestimating the scale.

> The main problem here is that the JEP bug doesn't really contain much
> details, from the look of it seems like a trivial walk in the park, but
> then the list of high profile initial contributors is massive.

You are reading way more into this than there is.  These are simply the 
members of the compiler group who are Committers to jdk; this is done 
because any of these people *might* want to contribute.

I think it is on this incorrect inference (many committers -> huge 
project) that your concerns in the first paragraph rest?