From aph at redhat.com  Sat Oct  1 08:14:06 2016
From: aph at redhat.com (Andrew Haley)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 09:14:06 +0100
Subject: OpenJDK6 End Of Life
Message-ID: <00b50659-c1b3-a3e8-0956-c8a3258a300f@redhat.com>

OpenJDK6 is reaching the end of the road.  Oracle's JDK 6 had
its last public update in 2013, and I took over the leadership
role in OpenJDK 6 in March of that year.  But it's looking
decidedly old now, and we should persuade people to move to
something more recent.

Since I took over the lead we've maintained OpenJDK 6, back-porting
important bug fixes and some updates, but I think the time has now
come to say goodbye.  We can't maintain it for ever, and we've been
strongly recommending people to move to a more recent release for some
time.

With all that in mind, I intend to resign leadership of OpenJDK 6 at
the end of his year.  If any appropriately-qualified person wishes to
take over the project leadership, they may apply to do so.  However, I
expect that the OpenJDK 6 project will quietly end.

OpenJDK 6 EOL: December 31, 2016.

Andrew.

From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Tue Oct  4 15:50:35 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 17:50:35 +0200
Subject: Differences between openJDK and oracleJDK
In-Reply-To: <04d81b26f02a4254a12836d89bf650dd@exchange.sh-solutions.de>
References: <5950991d5ccf442e8d3ba59a035de590@exchange.sh-solutions.de>
	<b86b499f-1bb6-f749-e417-518364464fb8@oracle.com>
	<45E7F913-4933-40AE-88B6-7B17CBFECF8B@oracle.com>
	<04d81b26f02a4254a12836d89bf650dd@exchange.sh-solutions.de>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh10rFmk0oG300Lgf5Gk0GP=N4zyC8=4xh8ZibC7vYF0Sww@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten)
<lists at steffen-heil.de> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
>
>> The original mail is about the method missing, not the class.
>
> Exactly.
>
>
>> That said, I also don't think there is any difference between OpenJDK and Oracle JDK here.
>>
>> *Steffen*, how do you find the method is missing? The latest jdk9 is modularized so you cannot call internal method like before. Is
>> that the reason? Can you show the compilation or runtime error?
>
> The following works in openJDK 1.8.0.101:
>
> AuthorityKeyIdentifierExtension akidext = ....;
> byte[] kid = akidext.getEncodedKeyIdentifier();
>
> But in oracleJDK 1.8.0.101 it leads to a compile time error, because that method does not exist.
>
>
>> > There is no difference in the Oracle and OpenJDK JSSE implementation. They are the same.
>
> Obviously, there is.
>

The explanation is quite simple:)

 - go get the OpenJDK sources from
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u-dev/jdk
 - take a look at the modifications you are interested in:

hg annotate src/share/classes/sun/security/x509/AuthorityKeyIdentifierExtension.java

...
    0:     }
11494:
11494:     /**
11494:      * Return the encoded key identifier, or null if not specified.
11494:      */
11494:     public byte[] getEncodedKeyIdentifier() throws IOException {
11494:         if (id != null) {
11494:             DerOutputStream derOut = new DerOutputStream();
11494:             id.encode(derOut);
11494:             return derOut.toByteArray();
11494:         }
11494:         return null;
11494:     }
    0: }
...

This will show you that the function you're interested in was added
with change 11494

 - now get the bug id of this change:

$ hg log -r 11494
changeset:   11494:ffd65eb4d2be 11476:5b8ec82dc4d3
user:        mullan
date:        Mon Mar 21 14:13:57 2016 +0000
summary:     8072463: Remove requirement that AKID and SKID have to
match when building certificate chain
Reviewed-by: xuelei

 - finally check the bug in the Java bug system:

https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8072463

...
JDK-8142944 8u102  Sean Coffey P3 Resolved Fixed b02
JDK-8142945 7u121  Sean Coffey P3 Resolved Fixed b01
JDK-8155040 7u111  Sean Coffey P3 Closed Won't Fix
JDK-8156372 8u111  Sean Mullan P3 Resolved Fixed b01
JDK-8162209 emb-8u111  Sean Mullan P3 Resolved Fixed b01
...

It lists all the builds where this issue has been integrated and 8u101
is obviously not among the releases which contains this fix (8u102b02
is actually the first branch containing this fix).

In the OpenJDK sources, this change is definitely not in the jdk8u101
branch. You should ask the provider of your "openJDK 1.8.0.101" binary
why he has some functionality in it which only appears in the OpenJDK
repositories in the jdk8u102 branch (starting from build 2).

Regards,
Volker

>
>> That said, other distributions which
>> derive from OpenJDK (e.g. IcedTea or Linux distros) may have differences, but that is outside my knowledge area.  If you build
>> OpenJDK from the source, the binaries of JSSE in OpenJDK and OracleJDK will be the same.
>
> I downloaded the source of openJDK from its source repositories and compiled it myself.
> I also tested with https://github.com/ojdkbuild/ojdkbuild.
>
> I downloaded oracleJDK from oracle itself.
>
> So I don't think this is the issue.
>
>
> Regards,
>   Steffen
>
>

From weijun.wang at oracle.com  Tue Oct  4 23:20:12 2016
From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:20:12 +0800
Subject: Differences between openJDK and oracleJDK
In-Reply-To: <CA+3eh10rFmk0oG300Lgf5Gk0GP=N4zyC8=4xh8ZibC7vYF0Sww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5950991d5ccf442e8d3ba59a035de590@exchange.sh-solutions.de>
	<b86b499f-1bb6-f749-e417-518364464fb8@oracle.com>
	<45E7F913-4933-40AE-88B6-7B17CBFECF8B@oracle.com>
	<04d81b26f02a4254a12836d89bf650dd@exchange.sh-solutions.de>
	<CA+3eh10rFmk0oG300Lgf5Gk0GP=N4zyC8=4xh8ZibC7vYF0Sww@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <eb95e494-562b-61f2-e501-e704af2caca2@oracle.com>

On 10/4/2016 11:50 PM, Volker Simonis wrote:
> The explanation is quite simple:)

Brilliant investigation!

--Max

From mboundaoui at yahoo.co.uk  Wed Oct  5 11:04:15 2016
From: mboundaoui at yahoo.co.uk (Larbi Boundaoui)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 13:04:15 +0200
Subject: Want to join: Propose again JSR 323: "Strong Mobility for, Java"?
	(dalibor topic)
Message-ID: <a4e5f134-4c0c-a637-8151-bf833337e92e@yahoo.co.uk>

Hi Dalibor,

   Thanks for your reply, but I don't think this is a research project, 
it is a very concrete feature that is proposed, it's even been proposed 
before as you know, and therefore the proposed JSR is very specific.

  I believe there has never been a greater need of Strong Mobility than 
today, seen the variety of platforms, and why would the past decade of 
development in hypervisors and related technologies be in contradiction 
with the need of Strong Mobility?

Rgds.,

  Larbi.


From dalibor.topic at oracle.com  Wed Oct  5 12:17:21 2016
From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:17:21 +0200
Subject: Want to join: Propose again JSR 323: "Strong Mobility for, Java"?
	(dalibor topic)
In-Reply-To: <a4e5f134-4c0c-a637-8151-bf833337e92e@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <a4e5f134-4c0c-a637-8151-bf833337e92e@yahoo.co.uk>
Message-ID: <08b4b0f8-939b-5000-3b0b-7647f9b8516b@oracle.com>



On 05.10.2016 13:04, Larbi Boundaoui wrote:
> Hi Dalibor,
>
>   Thanks for your reply, but I don't think this is a research project,
> it is a very concrete feature that is proposed, it's even been proposed
> before as you know, and therefore the proposed JSR is very specific.

If you look at research around strong mobility and the JVM, it seems 
that almost all of it petered out about 10 years ago. That's a long time 
ago in internet years, so some of the assumptions made in the initial 
JSR might have changed meanwhile. There seem to be no actively 
maintained open source projects of that nature, either, suggesting that 
the idea has not been embraced by mainstream developers since the 
research ended.

In addition, please consider that the original JSR 323 claims that 
"Since JVM is written in C language" something else is true, which is an 
odd thing to claim.

HotSpot, for example, is not written in the C language. Projects like 
Graal and Truffle are largely written in Java, for another example, and 
so they may (or may not) be a better starting ground for research in 
this area.

>  I believe there has never been a greater need of Strong Mobility than
> today, seen the variety of platforms, and why would the past decade of
> development in hypervisors and related technologies be in contradiction
> with the need of Strong Mobility?

In the last decade some virtualization projects and products started to 
provide live migration capabilities. See 
http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/virtualization/ovm-server-for-x86-459312.pdf 
for an example of such a product.

That doesn't invalidate your perceived need per se, but it does raise 
the question whether a bytecode (re)translation based approach, as seems 
to be suggested by the rejected JSR, is the best way to migrate hot code 
around today in, say, a cloud running on virtualized containers.

If you watch John's VM futures talk from this year's JVM summit, the 
Stack Reification idea seems it could go a long way towards providing a 
better, JVM level facility for exploratory ideas such as yours. If you 
are interested in discussing such ideas, the right mailing list is mlvm-dev.

cheers,
dalibor topic


-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603

Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

From dalibor.topic at oracle.com  Wed Oct  5 19:57:43 2016
From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic)
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 21:57:43 +0200
Subject: JDK 9 Outreach Survey
In-Reply-To: <3e9fe1fd-d91a-46c0-be53-c0d70f43964c@default>
References: <3e9fe1fd-d91a-46c0-be53-c0d70f43964c@default>
Message-ID: <ed004a0b-5fa5-b8bf-bc51-6367d702a18d@oracle.com>

Thanks to everyone who participated. The survey is now closed.

I'll prepare a summary of results in the coming days and share it with 
this list.

cheers,
dalibor topic

On 19.09.2016 14:55, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to encourage and receive additional feedback from developers testing their applications with JDK 9, the OpenJDK Quality Outreach effort has put together a very brief survey about your experiences with JDK 9 so far.
>
> It is available at
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.de/r/JDK9EA
>
> If you are a Free and Open Source Software developer taking part in a public Java or JVM based project that has looked at JDK 9, we'd love to hear from you.
>
> If for some reason or other you haven't quite looked at JDK 9 yet, don't worry: you can grab a build from http://jdk9.java.net (or GNU make your own build from the source code in hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9), and let us know through the survey how you and JDK 9 get along from there on.
>
> A summary of the results will be shared on this list once the survey completes.
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
>

-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603

Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

From chris.hegarty at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:32:15 2016
From: chris.hegarty at oracle.com (Chris Hegarty)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:32:15 +0100
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <D218D239-9AEF-4252-BCD9-CFDBD2BD569C@oracle.com>

Vote: YES.

-Chris.

> On 20 Oct 2016, at 17:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From philip.race at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:36:41 2016
From: philip.race at oracle.com (Phil Race)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:36:41 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <07051392-8727-0699-a52d-7a2244a88e01@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

-phil.


From roman at kennke.org  Thu Oct 20 16:43:29 2016
From: roman at kennke.org (Roman Kennke)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:43:29 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <1476981809.2548.15.camel@kennke.org>

Vote: yes

Am Donnerstag, den 20.10.2016, 09:30 -0700 schrieb
mark.reinhold at oracle.com:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the
> Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in
> a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community
> Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.??Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.??Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To
> header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+
> JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
> 

From naoto.sato at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:45:05 2016
From: naoto.sato at oracle.com (Naoto Sato)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:45:05 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <f51d59d8-6148-41cb-ba5d-9ea1e08c2b53@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Naoto

On 10/20/16 9:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From daniel.fuchs at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:48:16 2016
From: daniel.fuchs at oracle.com (Daniel Fuchs)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:48:16 +0100
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <a7856304-84cb-9229-eba3-e6ef33cbc5dc@oracle.com>

Vote: YES

-- daniel

On 20/10/16 17:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.


From Alan.Bateman at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:49:02 2016
From: Alan.Bateman at oracle.com (Alan Bateman)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:49:02 +0100
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <59553872-015b-7582-2831-54c78a69b166@oracle.com>

Vote: yes



From joe.darcy at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:51:04 2016
From: joe.darcy at oracle.com (joe darcy)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:51:04 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <eb10749a-2fe2-e1bc-01d7-de776a225f15@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

-Joe



From volker.simonis at gmail.com  Thu Oct 20 16:52:13 2016
From: volker.simonis at gmail.com (Volker Simonis)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:52:13 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <5808f165.8995620a.1e52c.92c2SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <5808f165.8995620a.1e52c.92c2SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Message-ID: <CA+3eh12JbXGztm-7Diq-UdKBdLstCkjxP2Ce6zZ25GBcm0aWHw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: yes


On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 6:30 PM,  <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote

From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:54:45 2016
From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:54:45 -0400
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <9fca6ba5-cf92-c56c-03e8-b88936578f82@Oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

On 10/20/2016 12:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>


From lance.andersen at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:54:44 2016
From: lance.andersen at oracle.com (Lance Andersen)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:54:44 -0400
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <08E54C36-7F28-44D5-9A04-6D5709973E79@oracle.com>

vote: YES
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 12:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
Lance.Andersen at oracle.com <mailto:Lance.Andersen at oracle.com>




From vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 16:54:35 2016
From: vincent.x.ryan at oracle.com (Vincent Ryan)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:54:35 +0100
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <792B4703-4B7C-4DE6-8EC9-2A5427317066@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


> On 20 Oct 2016, at 17:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 17:02:35 2016
From: vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com (Vladimir Kozlov)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:02:35 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <5dc9a044-b91e-126c-e551-1ebb037ed7a8@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 10/20/16 9:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From laurent.daynes at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 17:13:09 2016
From: laurent.daynes at oracle.com (Laurent Daynes)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 19:13:09 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <5808FB25.8040203@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 10/20/2016 06:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From Peter.B.Kessler at Oracle.COM  Thu Oct 20 17:23:41 2016
From: Peter.B.Kessler at Oracle.COM (Peter B. Kessler)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:23:41 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <47c562d6-d393-2a28-d63d-1cf8c1068108@Oracle.COM>

Vote: yes

			... peter

On 10/20/16 09:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> ....

From iris.clark at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 17:48:41 2016
From: iris.clark at oracle.com (Iris Clark)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <9af7b54c-5d12-43c9-8ea7-2acec7c2950a@default>

Vote: yes

iris

From brian.goetz at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 18:05:18 2016
From: brian.goetz at oracle.com (Brian Goetz)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:05:18 -0400
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <482388BF-4A19-4FD2-9E01-A20A56DBC8E1@oracle.com>

vote: yes

> On Oct 20, 2016, at 12:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From brent.christian at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 18:34:29 2016
From: brent.christian at oracle.com (Brent Christian)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 11:34:29 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <58090E35.2080909@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

-Brent


From openjdk at haupz.de  Thu Oct 20 19:11:21 2016
From: openjdk at haupz.de (Michael Haupt)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:11:21 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <482388BF-4A19-4FD2-9E01-A20A56DBC8E1@oracle.com>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
	<482388BF-4A19-4FD2-9E01-A20A56DBC8E1@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <37048846-0BB4-4F3F-AD2A-1B7C97DD639E@haupz.de>

Vote: yes.

Note that Mark's original CFV appears not to be part of this thread - the listing starts with Chris Hegarty's vote: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/thread.html <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/thread.html>

Best,

Michael

> Am 20.10.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com>:
> 
> vote: yes
> 
>> On Oct 20, 2016, at 12:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
>> 
>> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
>> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>> 
>> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
>> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
>> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>> 
>> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
>> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
>> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>> 
>> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
>> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
>> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>> 
>> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>> 
>> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
>> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
>> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>> 
>> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>> 
>> - Mark
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
>> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
>> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
>> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
>> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
> 


From sean.mullan at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 19:33:44 2016
From: sean.mullan at oracle.com (Sean Mullan)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:33:44 -0400
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <269314cf-8593-a2a4-d2af-be5889b57bcd@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

From karen.kinnear at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 19:34:03 2016
From: karen.kinnear at oracle.com (Karen Kinnear)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:34:03 -0400
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <85E4E165-5FCA-41F7-B2ED-F7C219B072B5@oracle.com>

vote: yes

thanks,
Karen


From staffan.larsen at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 19:40:21 2016
From: staffan.larsen at oracle.com (Staffan Larsen)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 21:40:21 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <0521F601-C0E0-4CF2-BFCD-0A0A1AD6A7CE@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

> On 20 Oct 2016, at 18:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From stuart.marks at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 20:31:34 2016
From: stuart.marks at oracle.com (Stuart Marks)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:31:34 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <aeaed081-2a0f-2069-6520-93b4a9cb29be@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 10/20/16 9:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From openjdk at haupz.de  Thu Oct 20 20:36:44 2016
From: openjdk at haupz.de (Michael Haupt)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 22:36:44 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <37048846-0BB4-4F3F-AD2A-1B7C97DD639E@haupz.de>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
	<482388BF-4A19-4FD2-9E01-A20A56DBC8E1@oracle.com>
	<37048846-0BB4-4F3F-AD2A-1B7C97DD639E@haupz.de>
Message-ID: <AE9804E7-856D-4956-B60E-30CD0ACD638B@haupz.de>

(... never mind; I found the original e-mail on the announce list.)

> Am 20.10.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Michael Haupt <openjdk at haupz.de>:
> ...
> Note that Mark's original CFV appears not to be part of this thread - the listing starts with Chris Hegarty's vote: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/thread.html <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2016-October/thread.html>
> 
> Best,
> 
> Michael



From david.holmes at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 20:53:37 2016
From: david.holmes at oracle.com (David Holmes)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 06:53:37 +1000
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <b3e2e662-8ba0-431b-2e8d-b85f8028a225@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

David

On 21/10/2016 2:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From james.graham at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 20:56:44 2016
From: james.graham at oracle.com (Jim Graham)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:56:44 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <c4e7486c-4e50-3a56-a689-d8bafd2a1aa5@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

		...jim

On 10/20/16 9:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From james.laskey at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 21:32:39 2016
From: james.laskey at oracle.com (Jim Laskey (Oracle))
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 18:32:39 -0300
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <1BE1C4CA-1A82-4210-A13D-350533D52B13@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


> On Oct 20, 2016, at 1:30 PM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
> 
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
> 
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
> 
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
> 
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
> 
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
> 
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
> 
> - Mark
> 
> 
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From daniel.daugherty at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 22:19:41 2016
From: daniel.daugherty at oracle.com (Daniel D. Daugherty)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:19:41 -0600
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <ffa2a200-fb1d-4d48-12c1-26875dc2d788@oracle.com>

Vote: yes!

Dan


On 10/20/16 10:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>



From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com  Thu Oct 20 23:24:58 2016
From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons)
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 16:24:58 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <5809524A.30102@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 10/20/2016 09:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From yuka.kamiya at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 00:55:28 2016
From: yuka.kamiya at oracle.com (Yuka Kamiya)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:55:28 +0900
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <6a79d6f0-95f1-678e-afb0-e33cde6720c7@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 2016/10/21 1:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From weijun.wang at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 04:28:50 2016
From: weijun.wang at oracle.com (Wang Weijun)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:28:50 +0800
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <37e52ebd-6484-1bec-399d-1231d62741a0@oracle.com>

Vote: yes.

--weijun

On 10/21/2016 12:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 05:07:31 2016
From: masayoshi.okutsu at oracle.com (Masayoshi Okutsu)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:07:31 +0900
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <e027f056-53f0-024e-cc5a-a33d9cba70af@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


On 10/21/2016 1:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From stefan.karlsson at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 07:28:38 2016
From: stefan.karlsson at oracle.com (Stefan Karlsson)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:28:38 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <16643b62-0855-4507-97e9-e3c2fcc16991@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

StefanK

On 2016-10-20 18:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From mikael.gerdin at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 07:54:07 2016
From: mikael.gerdin at oracle.com (Mikael Gerdin)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:54:07 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <c63dfd18-d2ee-618e-18c6-4520d8b65564@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

/Mikael

On 2016-10-20 18:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>

From thomas.schatzl at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 07:55:56 2016
From: thomas.schatzl at oracle.com (Thomas Schatzl)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:55:56 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <16643b62-0855-4507-97e9-e3c2fcc16991@oracle.com>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
	<16643b62-0855-4507-97e9-e3c2fcc16991@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <1477036556.4493.0.camel@oracle.com>

Vote: yes


From dalibor.topic at oracle.com  Fri Oct 21 14:26:24 2016
From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (dalibor topic)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:26:24 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <10ada505-e7e7-ae01-e9b6-ec91398286a1@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes.


-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K?hneh?fe 5 | 22761 Hamburg

ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRA 95603

Komplement?rin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher

<http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
practices and products that help protect the environment

From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Fri Oct 21 15:54:54 2016
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 17:54:54 +0200
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <5808f17a.d176240a.926af.4ba4SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
References: <5808f17a.d176240a.926af.4ba4SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaSN1ZeiY47o-bhTKjMOWuT1+jqVFx3S2uw-cbAMrFfRfw@mail.gmail.com>

Vote: Yes,

Cheers,
Mario


2016-10-20 18:30 GMT+02:00  <mark.reinhold at oracle.com>:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote



-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com  Mon Oct 24 12:54:05 2016
From: neugens.limasoftware at gmail.com (Mario Torre)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:54:05 +0200
Subject: Free Java DevRoom @ FOSDEM CFP now open
Message-ID: <CAGUMyaQND4epYD5c67CxfaHHHowQON88PCykP6CCfuBKoDa3EQ@mail.gmail.com>

We are pleased to announce the Call for Participation in the FOSDEM
2017 Free Java DevRoom!

This year FOSDEM Free Java DevRoom will take place during one day
between the 4th and 5th February 2017 in Brussels [1], Belgium, with
the usual events and meetings surrounding the main show on Friday,
Saturday and Sunday; please, refer to the FOSDEM website for the
schedule of the whole event:

https://fosdem.org/2017/

The Free Java DevRoom has become unique in that it has attracted
hackers from very different Free Software Java projects, giving the
opportunity to bring together companies of various sizes, different
project communities, mainstream core Java developers, alternative Java
language implementations and runtimes, and everything that form the
Free Java Universe, everybody participating to share their knowledge
in an atmosphere of cooperation and friendly competition.

The Java Community has never been more vibrant than now, and the final
preparations of Java 9 with Jigsaw are bringing in more contributions
and interesting discussions. A Java 10 project has also just been
proposed, those are exciting times!

Every piece of the puzzle seems to be falling "in its right place",
so, what better opportunity to come and share your experiences than
the Java Dev Room at FOSDEM!?

As always, check out our wiki for more details on the conference:

https://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam/2017/Fosdem

And join the Free Java DevoRoom mailing list:

https://lists.fosdem.org/listinfo/java-devroom

*** IMPORTANT ***

Fosdem organisers have expressed the desire to record and stream
everything, and we will do our best to ensure this is respected.

We will use the same format as last year, so please submit one (or
more) 25 minute talk proposal(s) by the 1st of December 2016, 23.59
CET on the mailing list.

If your speech requires more time, and it's of a general importance to
warrant that, please state so in the description.

A template for submitting a talk can be found at:

http://wiki.debian.org/Java/DevJam/2017/Fosdem/CallForParticipation

Tracks will be announced around 10th of December on the mailing list.

Please join us!

--The Free Java DevRoom Committee

[1] Please, refer to the website for the exact day of the Free Java DevRoom.

-- 
pgp key: http://subkeys.pgp.net/ PGP Key ID: 80F240CF
Fingerprint: BA39 9666 94EC 8B73 27FA  FC7C 4086 63E3 80F2 40CF

Java Champion - Blog: http://neugens.wordpress.com - Twitter: @neugens
Proud GNU Classpath developer: http://www.classpath.org/
OpenJDK: http://openjdk.java.net/projects/caciocavallo/

Please, support open standards:
http://endsoftpatents.org/

From maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com  Mon Oct 24 13:22:53 2016
From: maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com (Maurizio Cimadamore)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:22:53 +0100
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <3de6fcda-bf58-9662-96b4-a7ddac49d8f4@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Maurizio


On 20/10/16 17:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From sean.coffey at oracle.com  Mon Oct 24 14:30:04 2016
From: sean.coffey at oracle.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Se=c3=a1n_Coffey?=)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:30:04 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <6dec1d17-c3e2-bdd4-6187-b9684a734b79@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes

regards,
Sean.

On 20/10/2016 09:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote


From mandy.chung at oracle.com  Mon Oct 24 17:24:22 2016
From: mandy.chung at oracle.com (Mandy Chung)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:24:22 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <65017C04-C516-409B-A6CC-DCBA3D332CFF@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

Mandy


From Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com  Mon Oct 24 18:04:06 2016
From: Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com (Sergey Bylokhov)
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:04:06 +0300
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <22e42188-d949-71bc-44eb-210670338192@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 20.10.16 19:30, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.

From lavlozm at gmail.com  Wed Oct 26 20:43:41 2016
From: lavlozm at gmail.com (Abdessamed MANSOURI)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 21:43:41 +0100
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
Message-ID: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hello all,

I was looking about how Java do unit tests of its standard library and i've
found in the code source of OpenJDK unit tests under test folder, my
question is why Java uses direct unit tests (using main) and it doesn't use
a powerfull framework as JUnit? i think it is possible to use it because
unit tests of standard lib are already written in Java.

-- 
Thanks,

Abdessamed MANSOURI

From Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com  Wed Oct 26 20:53:53 2016
From: Roger.Riggs at Oracle.com (Roger Riggs)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:53:53 -0400
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
In-Reply-To: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <530b338f-901f-f87a-831c-465823f6565a@Oracle.com>

Hi,

The tests in the JDK has been accumulating for two plus decades and 
several different frameworks
have been used over time.  More recent tests use the TestNG framework as 
supported
by jtreg.    Some developers prefer the direct usefulness of main with 
no extra work to
setup and run individual tests as is needed for debugging.

$.02, Roger


On 10/26/2016 4:43 PM, Abdessamed MANSOURI wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was looking about how Java do unit tests of its standard library and i've
> found in the code source of OpenJDK unit tests under test folder, my
> question is why Java uses direct unit tests (using main) and it doesn't use
> a powerfull framework as JUnit? i think it is possible to use it because
> unit tests of standard lib are already written in Java.
>


From jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com  Wed Oct 26 20:56:00 2016
From: jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com (Jonathan Gibbons)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:56:00 -0700
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
In-Reply-To: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <58111860.4020207@oracle.com>



On 10/26/2016 01:43 PM, Abdessamed MANSOURI wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was looking about how Java do unit tests of its standard library and i've
> found in the code source of OpenJDK unit tests under test folder, my
> question is why Java uses direct unit tests (using main) and it doesn't use
> a powerfull framework as JUnit? i think it is possible to use it because
> unit tests of standard lib are already written in Java.
>

There are various aspects to this.

The most obvious one is that many of the tests date back to a time 
before there
was any framework like JUnit or TestNG.

In addition, many of the tests rely on features not directly supported 
by those
frameworks, such as the easy ability to execute in a separate JVM, or to 
vary
the security manager or policy for each test.

Finally, the OpenJDK test framework (jtreg) does now support tests 
written for
TestNG, and to a lesser extent, JUnit as well, and this has been used 
for some
of the more recent additions to the test suite.

-- Jon



From lavlozm at gmail.com  Wed Oct 26 21:34:11 2016
From: lavlozm at gmail.com (Abdessamed MANSOURI)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:34:11 +0100
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
In-Reply-To: <CANN1r-Ti7UfZC1gvPz+pcJ2e9J5uw2E3qoDD=GheLKVD+kEi-w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<58111860.4020207@oracle.com>
	<CANN1r-Ti7UfZC1gvPz+pcJ2e9J5uw2E3qoDD=GheLKVD+kEi-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANN1r-RyaAvr0QVF=AMeut0eDbBzBmqhmJ4CfEvYvyBXoGsDvA@mail.gmail.com>

Rogger and Jon, Thank you for your quick answers, I didn't noticed the
presence of these framework, i was primarily how Java unit test IO API to
respect the contracts because i need to provide some streams, and as Jon
said, these tests date back to a time before there were theses frameworks,
so i thought Java doesn't use any framework (So its less probably to see
test written in TestNG from the first time).

2016-10-26 22:33 GMT+01:00 Abdessamed MANSOURI <amansouri at alti-dz.com>:

> Rogger and Jon, Thank you for your quick answers, I didn't noticed the
> presence of these framework, i was primarily how Java unit test IO API to
> respect the contracts because i need to provide some streams, and as Jon
> said, these tests date back to a time before there were theses frameworks,
> so i thought Java doesn't use any framework (So its less probably to see
> test written in TestNG from the first time).
>



-- 
Thanks,

Abdessamed MANSOURI

From lavlozm at gmail.com  Wed Oct 26 21:34:56 2016
From: lavlozm at gmail.com (Abdessamed MANSOURI)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:34:56 +0100
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
In-Reply-To: <CANN1r-RyaAvr0QVF=AMeut0eDbBzBmqhmJ4CfEvYvyBXoGsDvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<58111860.4020207@oracle.com>
	<CANN1r-Ti7UfZC1gvPz+pcJ2e9J5uw2E3qoDD=GheLKVD+kEi-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANN1r-RyaAvr0QVF=AMeut0eDbBzBmqhmJ4CfEvYvyBXoGsDvA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANN1r-T07MzWBgho7EWKdRgvVx8Q7t=BD7VsX0sG0gw_Zz5zXg@mail.gmail.com>

Rogger and Jon, Thank you for your quick answers, I didn't noticed the
presence of these framework, i was primarily how Java unit test IO API to
respect the contracts because i need to provide some streams, and as Jon
said, these tests date back to a time before there were theses frameworks,
so i thought Java doesn't use any framework (So its less probably to see
test written in TestNG from the first time).

2016-10-26 22:34 GMT+01:00 Abdessamed MANSOURI <lavlozm at gmail.com>:

> Rogger and Jon, Thank you for your quick answers, I didn't noticed the
> presence of these framework, i was primarily how Java unit test IO API to
> respect the contracts because i need to provide some streams, and as Jon
> said, these tests date back to a time before there were theses frameworks,
> so i thought Java doesn't use any framework (So its less probably to see
> test written in TestNG from the first time).
>
> 2016-10-26 22:33 GMT+01:00 Abdessamed MANSOURI <amansouri at alti-dz.com>:
>
>> Rogger and Jon, Thank you for your quick answers, I didn't noticed the
>> presence of these framework, i was primarily how Java unit test IO API to
>> respect the contracts because i need to provide some streams, and as Jon
>> said, these tests date back to a time before there were theses frameworks,
>> so i thought Java doesn't use any framework (So its less probably to see
>> test written in TestNG from the first time).
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Abdessamed MANSOURI
>



-- 
Thanks,

Abdessamed MANSOURI

From semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com  Wed Oct 26 21:36:47 2016
From: semyon.sadetsky at oracle.com (Semyon Sadetsky)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 00:36:47 +0300
Subject: Unit Test of standard lib
In-Reply-To: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANN1r-SrvSv1s4-uS0XBE+Fou+vwdJbBK20yYVt=ExFA+shMLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5ba7d284-5f2c-0916-24a6-a07e588a6a07@oracle.com>

On 10/26/2016 11:43 PM, Abdessamed MANSOURI wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was looking about how Java do unit tests of its standard library and i've
> found in the code source of OpenJDK unit tests under test folder, my
> question is why Java uses direct unit tests (using main) and it doesn't use
> a powerfull framework as JUnit? i think it is possible to use it because
> unit tests of standard lib are already written in Java.
>
There may be license incompatibility.

In general GPL v2 (OpenJDK) is not compatible with EPL (JUnit) and 
Apache 2.0 (TestNG).

--Semyon


From bradford.wetmore at oracle.com  Thu Oct 27 22:13:00 2016
From: bradford.wetmore at oracle.com (Bradford Wetmore)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:13:00 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <6875858f-e739-d7a8-e0fb-6b0f17542bb7@oracle.com>

Vote: Yes.

Brad

From kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com  Fri Oct 28 13:46:37 2016
From: kumar.x.srinivasan at oracle.com (Kumar Srinivasan)
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 06:46:37 -0700
Subject: CFV: New Project: JDK 10
In-Reply-To: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
References: <20161020093044.269497520eggemoggin.niobe.net>
Message-ID: <581356BD.7000600@oracle.com>

Vote: yes

On 10/20/2016 9:30 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the JDK 10 Project, with me as the Lead
> and the Governing Board as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The goal of this Project will be to produce an open-source reference
> implementation of the Java SE 10 Platform, which will be specified in a
> corresponding JSR, yet to be submitted, in the Java Community Process.
>
> The Project's repositories will initially be open for bug fixes and
> small enhancements only.  Features for the release will be proposed
> and tracked via the proposed JEP 2.0 Process [1].
>
> Anyone who holds the Author, Committer, or Reviewer role in the JDK 9
> Project [2] and has contributed at least one changeset to JDK 9 will
> be granted the same role in the JDK 10 Project.
>
> Votes are due by 17:00 UTC next Thursday, 27 October [3].
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [4] are eligible to vote on this motion.
> Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.  Replying to this
> message is sufficient if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [5].
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jep/jep-2.0-02.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/census#jdk9
> [3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=OpenJDK+JDK+10+CFV&iso=20161027T1700
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote