CFV: Project Amber

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Thu Jan 26 03:51:13 UTC 2017


Vote: yes

David

On 26/01/2017 2:36 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> [ Sending to announce at openjdk.java.net; had previously been sent to
> discuss at openjdk.java.net, and some votes have already been registered
> there ]
>
> I hereby propose the creation of Project Amber with myself as the Lead
> and the Compiler group as the sponsoring group.
>
> In accordance with the OpenJDK guidelines [1], this project will provide
> a venue to explore and incubate smaller, productivity-oriented Java
> language features that have been accepted as candidate JEPs under the
> OpenJDK JEP process [2], including:
>
>  - JEP 286 (Local Variable Type Inference) [3]
>  - JEP 301 (Enhanced Enums) [4]
>  - JEP 302 (Lambda Leftovers) [5]
>
> as well as future suitable JEPs that are adopted by the project.
>
> The initial Reviewers and Committers will be:
>
> * Brian Goetz
> * John Rose
> * Paul Sandoz
> * Maurizio Cimadamore
> * Dan Smith
> * Gavin Bierman
> * Vicente Romero
> * Alex Buckley
> * Jon Gibbons
> * Joe Darcy
> * Remi Forax
> * Mark Reinhold
>
>
> The project will host at least the following mailing list:
>
> * amber-dev for development discussions and user feedback
> * amber-spec-experts for design and specification discussions
>
> The initial source of this project will be based on a clone of a JDK 10
> repository.  Changes from the JDK 10 parent will be synced into Amber
> periodically.  Similar to Projects Lambda and Valhalla, we will follow a
> "commit first, review later" policy, as code will not flow directly from
> the Amber repositories into the JDK repositories, but instead will be
> done by a "curated merge" where select changes are extracted into new
> changesets for incorporation into JDK repositories when they are ready
> for inclusion.
>
> Votes are due by Feb 8, 2017.
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [6] are eligible to vote on this
> motion.  Votes must be cast in the open on the discuss list.
> Replying to this message is sufficient if your mail program
> honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [7].
>
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/1
> [3] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/286
> [4] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/301
> [5] http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/302
> [6] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [7] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>
>
>


More information about the discuss mailing list