Group Proposal, for discussion: Vulnerability Group

[Martijn Verburg]

Hi Mark,

Apologies for the radio silence.  I was going to suggest edits de-emphasising
Oracle's leadership / central role in this group, not because Oracle
doesn't deserve to or have the right to lead, but more that I wanted to see
the principles of shared vulnerability ownership (across all the vendors)
front and center in the proposal.

After a careful re-read of the doc I've realised that my impression was
plain wrong and that the shared ownership is very much advocated.

Thanks again for proposing this important group, it's really good to see!



Cheers,
Martijn

On 24 August 2017 at 22:16, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:

> 2017/8/24 10:33:41 -0700, martijnverburg at gmail.com:
> > Totally applaud this idea!  I have some suggested wording changes that
> > might be easiest to suggest as a diff or some sort of track changes on
> the
> > original text.  Do you have a preferred mechanism for that type of
> feedback?
>
> If you'd like to propose a patch, I've posted the Markdown source here:
>
>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/ojvg/ojvg.md
>
> - Mark
>