An impassioned plea on version numbers

[Sven Reimers]

This format already changed for 9.

Sven

Am 28.09.2017 08:43 schrieb "Peter Lawrey" <peter.lawrey at gmail.com>:

> I am assuming a minimum of changes to the format of the current internal
> Java version
>
> $ java -version
> java version "1.8.0_144"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.144-b01, mixed mode)
>
> With a recent version of Java 8 update 144, being 1.8.0_144 internally.
> ᐧ
>
> On 27 September 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 27/09/17 16:31, Peter Lawrey wrote:
> > > It's worth noting the version is likely to be
> > >
> > > 1.10.0_1
> > > 1.11.0_1
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > 1.18.3_1
> > > 1.18.9_1
> > > 1.19.3_1
> >
> > Why do you say that?
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Haley
> > Java Platform Lead Engineer
> > Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
> > EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
> >
>