An impassioned plea on version numbers
Nicolai Parlog
nipa at codefx.org
Fri Sep 29 10:08:45 UTC 2017
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Which I find truly funny, because when the year.month scheme was
proposed, 9.0 was still in the future.
On 28.09.2017 10:17, Sven Reimers wrote:
> This format already changed for 9.
>
> Sven
>
> Am 28.09.2017 08:43 schrieb "Peter Lawrey"
> <peter.lawrey at gmail.com>:
>
>> I am assuming a minimum of changes to the format of the current
>> internal Java version
>>
>> $ java -version java version "1.8.0_144" Java(TM) SE Runtime
>> Environment (build 1.8.0_144-b01) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
>> VM (build 25.144-b01, mixed mode)
>>
>> With a recent version of Java 8 update 144, being 1.8.0_144
>> internally. ᐧ
>>
>> On 27 September 2017 at 19:12, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 27/09/17 16:31, Peter Lawrey wrote:
>>>> It's worth noting the version is likely to be
>>>>
>>>> 1.10.0_1 1.11.0_1
>>>>
>>>> or
>>>>
>>>> 1.18.3_1 1.18.9_1 1.19.3_1
>>>
>>> Why do you say that?
>>>
>>> -- Andrew Haley Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd.
>>> <https://www.redhat.com> EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD
>>> 6035 332F A671
>>>
>>
>
- --
PGP Key:
http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0xCA3BAD2E9CCCD509
Web:
http://codefx.org
a blog about software development
https://www.sitepoint.com/java
high-quality Java/JVM content
http://do-foss.de
Free and Open Source Software for the City of Dortmund
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/nipafx
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=t4cD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the discuss
mailing list