CFV: New Project: Skara
Stuart Marks
stuart.marks at oracle.com
Thu Aug 30 01:26:07 UTC 2018
Vote: yes
On 8/29/18 10:58 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> I hereby propose the creation of the Skara Project with Joe Darcy as the Lead
> and the Build Group as the sponsoring Group.
>
> The source code management (SCM) system of a software project is a fundamental
> piece of its infrastructure and workflows. Starting in February 2008, the source
> code of different JDK releases and supporting projects has been hosted in
> Mercurial repositories under http://hg.openjdk.java.net/. Code reviews of JDK
> changes are typically conducted as discussions in mailing lists over small
> patches sent to one or more lists or over webrevs hosted on cr.openjdk.java.net.
> Since 2008, many open source projects have successfully adopted more efficient
> SCM and review tooling, in some cases provided by third parties.
>
> In order to help OpenJDK contributors be more productive, both seasoned
> committers and relative newcomers, the Skara project proposes to investigate
> alternative SCM and code review options for the JDK source code, including
> options based upon Git rather than Mercurial, and including options hosted by
> third parties.
>
> The Skara project intends to build prototypes of hosting the JDK 12 sources
> under different providers.
>
> The evaluation criteria to consider include but are not limited to:
>
> * Performance: time for clone operations from master repos, time of local
> operations, etc.
>
> * Space efficiency
>
> * Usability in different geographies
>
> * Support for common development environments such as Linux, Mac, and Windows
>
> * Able to easily host the entire history of the JDK and the projected
> growth of its history over the next decade
>
> * Support for general JDK code review practices
>
> * Programmatic APIs to enable process assistance and automation of review
> and processes
>
> If one or more prototypes indicate a different SCM arrangement offers
> substantial improvements over the current situation, the Skara project will
> shepherd a JEP to change the SCM for the JDK.
>
> Skara previously had a call for discussion
> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2018-July/004801.html) and was a
> topic at the OpenJDK Committers’ Workshop
> (http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/Presentations/ocw-2018-08-01-skara.pdf). A
> range of passionate opinions were expressed regarding the choice of SCM for the
> JDK, but the prototype imports of the JDK sources to hosting providers:
>
> https://github.com/Project-Skara/jdk.git
> https://gitlab.com/jddarcy/jdk.git
>
> have demonstrated much shorter clone times, on the order of one to three minutes
> as compared to fifteen minutes to over a half hour from hg.openjdk.java.net.
>
> The envisioned future iterations of prototypes could explore how to adapt JDK
> development practices to better conform to conventions on different SCMs. For
> example, some syntax changes in JDK commit messages would work more naturally
> with git tooling. Such prototypes would be published and made available for
> comment.
>
> Joe is a reviewer in the JDK project, the lead of the CSR (Compatibility &
> Specification Review) group (http://openjdk.java.net/groups/csr/), previous lead
> of Project Coin (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/coin/), initial moderator and
> inaugural release manager for OpenJDK 6, and was the lead for JEP 296:
> Consolidate the JDK Forest into a Single Repository
> (http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/296).
>
> Initial reviewers are Tim Bell (tbell), Joe Darcy (darcy), Erik Duveblad
> (ehelin), Erik Joelsson (erikj), Mark Reinhold (mr), Tony Squier (squierts),
> Tiep Vo (tiep), and Robin Westberg (rwestberg).
>
> Votes are due by September 12, 11 am Pacific Time.
>
> Only current OpenJDK Members [1] are eligible to vote on this motion. Votes must
> be cast in the open on the discuss list. Replying to this message is sufficient
> if your mail program honors the Reply-To header.
>
> For Lazy Consensus voting instructions, see [2].
>
> -Joe Darcy
>
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#members
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project-vote
>
More information about the discuss
mailing list