Group Proposal, for further discussion: Vulnerability Group
martijnverburg at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 05:47:16 UTC 2018
Looks good to us (ran it past legal for LJC / Adopt Build Farm).
On 6 February 2018 at 06:38, Volker Simonis <volker.simonis at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:44 PM, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:
> > (This is not a call for votes; it is just a call for discussion.)
> > To follow up on my initial call for discussion last August , I've
> > posted a revised proposal for the Vulnerability Group together with
> > the final version of the non-disclosure and license agreement, and
> > diffs of the final version with respect to the first version:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/ojvg/
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/ojvg/ojvg-ndla-2018-01-30.pdf
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/ojvg/ojvg-ndla-2018-01-30-diffs.pdf
> > The only change to the proposal itself is to add a link to define the
> > term "rough consensus," as suggested by Volker .
> Thanks for considering my suggestion. I actually didn't expected that
> the definition of "rough consensus" will be longer than the entire
> "OpenJDK Vulnerability Group" proposal, but rough consensus seems to
> be a complex topic :)
> The final agreement is under review. I'll let you know once it's done
> and we can finally sign it.
> > I'll propose to create the Vulnerability Group in one week, after
> > prospective initial Group Members have had time to review the final
> > agreement.
> > - Mark
> >  http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-August/
> >  http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-
More information about the discuss