Call For Vote: Project Tsan
Jean Christophe Beyler
jcbeyler at google.com
Thu Feb 14 20:54:23 UTC 2019
Hi Florian,
Our internal version is built on top of it so we currently are planning to
do the same in this project. Are there any issues you can foresee with
doing this?
Jc
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 5:50 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat.com> wrote:
> * Jean Christophe Beyler:
>
> > The evaluation criteria for the TSAN implementation includes but would
> not
> > be limited to:
> > * Performance: not adding overhead to non-tsan runs is paramount and
> > there are various means to do so
> > * General usefulness for the community at large so that the TSAN
> > feature is deemed a good feature to have
>
> Is there any relationship with the native TSAN implementation in LLVM?
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>
--
Thanks,
Jc
More information about the discuss
mailing list