From dalibor.topic at oracle.com  Wed Mar  2 17:07:52 2022
From: dalibor.topic at oracle.com (Dalibor Topic)
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:07:52 +0100
Subject: Relax Terms of Use / Drop Terms of Use requirement for GitHub
 comments
In-Reply-To: <82bee4fc769340208e7a0119cda4fec8@vodafonemail.de>
References: <82bee4fc769340208e7a0119cda4fec8@vodafonemail.de>
Message-ID: <50e405dd-43e6-1bb8-13c2-40770bead56a@oracle.com>

On 26.02.2022 01:40, some-java-user-99206970363698485155 at vodafonemail.de 
wrote:
 > Hello,
 > could you please consider relaxing the Terms of Use, or at least 
reconsider whether interaction on GitHub (e.g. pull request
 > comments) really has to require Terms of Use agreement?
 >

Hi,

GitHub pull requests are mirrored to mailing list threads, and vice 
versa. Accordingly, the same Terms of Use apply to both venues for 
comments to pull requests.

cheers,
dalibor topic

-- 
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic
Consulting Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214>, Mobile: +491737185961
<tel:+491737185961>

Oracle Global Services Germany GmbH
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 M?nchen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht M?nchen, HRB 246209
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Ralf Herrmann


From ethan at mccue.dev  Sun Mar  6 21:39:07 2022
From: ethan at mccue.dev (Ethan McCue)
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 16:39:07 -0500
Subject: dev.java feedback
In-Reply-To: <CA+NR86gsTBEzY5f7uuP5172a-mC9o5MFmCGQJ7Oi7cLybWx6cA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+NR86hYO3V9UZRveRokAsokDzouxyKyKPXme73qcgwzHBXn6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D221A1A-A9C4-48D6-B246-AEA74B070469@oracle.com>
 <CA+NR86gsTBEzY5f7uuP5172a-mC9o5MFmCGQJ7Oi7cLybWx6cA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+NR86hnL_TYq+ZVb9HwY9QmdiyEbxhA9STuvrYBuZaUuGqxRw@mail.gmail.com>

Following up again.

I have to assume that the team has not had time or inclination to review on
account of this still being on the home page.

"The DayOfWeek enum and the Month enum are dealing with day of weeks and
monts." (sic)

If there is anything I can do to make progress happen I will do it.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 9:43 PM Ethan McCue <ethan at mccue.dev> wrote:

> Just following up on this.
>
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:57 PM Chad Arimura <chad.arimura at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking the time Ethan. Our team will reach out directly once
>> we?ve had a time to review your suggestions.
>>
>> Chad
>>
>>
>> ?
>> Chad Arimura
>> Java Developer Relations
>> Oracle Corporation
>> +1-415-935-3448 [m]
>>
>> Dev.java - Inside.java - Twitter.com/java - Youtube.com/java
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 5, 2022, at 1:48 PM, Ethan McCue <ethan at mccue.dev> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I've gone through a chunk of the dev.java site and marked up feedback
>> in this Figma
>> >
>> > https://www.figma.com/file/pTnVYD5WHWxsIDoBDuUaFt/dev.java-feedback
>> >
>> > I know it's infinitely easier to be a critic than a creator, but I
>> think that there are very real structural problems with the site as it
>> exists right now and I don't yet have a better mechanism to affect change.
>> >
>> > The biggest and most pervasive issue is that there does not seem to be
>> a clearly defined audience.
>> >
>> > Tutorials will shift rapidly between being targeted at
>> > * Total beginners
>> > * Beginners to Java who might know another language
>> > * Intermediates looking for reference material
>> > * Experts looking to catch up on new features
>> >
>> > and the quality of content suffers massively as a result, ending up not
>> really being useful for any group.
>> >
>> > I am also cc-ing the discuss mailing list since I think this sort of
>> thing is relevant to the community as a whole.
>>
>>

From chad.arimura at oracle.com  Mon Mar  7 00:50:17 2022
From: chad.arimura at oracle.com (Chad Arimura)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 00:50:17 +0000
Subject: [External] : Re: dev.java feedback
In-Reply-To: <CA+NR86hnL_TYq+ZVb9HwY9QmdiyEbxhA9STuvrYBuZaUuGqxRw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+NR86hYO3V9UZRveRokAsokDzouxyKyKPXme73qcgwzHBXn6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <4D221A1A-A9C4-48D6-B246-AEA74B070469@oracle.com>
 <CA+NR86gsTBEzY5f7uuP5172a-mC9o5MFmCGQJ7Oi7cLybWx6cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+NR86hnL_TYq+ZVb9HwY9QmdiyEbxhA9STuvrYBuZaUuGqxRw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8E82F877-9C1F-4F49-B33F-66ABC95A8A8D@oracle.com>

Thanks for follow up Ethan. I'm just recently back from paternity leave and as mentioned will reach out direct when we can get to this.

Chad



On Mar 6, 2022, at 13:39, Ethan McCue <ethan at mccue.dev> wrote:

?
Following up again.

I have to assume that the team has not had time or inclination to review on account of this still being on the home page.

"The DayOfWeek enum and the Month enum are dealing with day of weeks and monts." (sic)

If there is anything I can do to make progress happen I will do it.

On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 9:43 PM Ethan McCue <ethan at mccue.dev<mailto:ethan at mccue.dev>> wrote:
Just following up on this.

On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:57 PM Chad Arimura <chad.arimura at oracle.com<mailto:chad.arimura at oracle.com>> wrote:
Thanks for taking the time Ethan. Our team will reach out directly once we?ve had a time to review your suggestions.

Chad


?
Chad Arimura
Java Developer Relations
Oracle Corporation
+1-415-935-3448 [m]

Dev.java - Inside.java - Twitter.com/java - Youtube.com/java







> On Feb 5, 2022, at 1:48 PM, Ethan McCue <ethan at mccue.dev<mailto:ethan at mccue.dev>> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've gone through a chunk of the dev.java site and marked up feedback in this Figma
>
> https://www.figma.com/file/pTnVYD5WHWxsIDoBDuUaFt/dev.java-feedback<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.figma.com/file/pTnVYD5WHWxsIDoBDuUaFt/dev.java-feedback__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Zw2iCi6gyqE6EbpNEdMzB8IxbCelJM9yJabLeuNEr8i0QQK8RtOTNljmuUSft88TeA$>
>
> I know it's infinitely easier to be a critic than a creator, but I think that there are very real structural problems with the site as it exists right now and I don't yet have a better mechanism to affect change.
>
> The biggest and most pervasive issue is that there does not seem to be a clearly defined audience.
>
> Tutorials will shift rapidly between being targeted at
> * Total beginners
> * Beginners to Java who might know another language
> * Intermediates looking for reference material
> * Experts looking to catch up on new features
>
> and the quality of content suffers massively as a result, ending up not really being useful for any group.
>
> I am also cc-ing the discuss mailing list since I think this sort of thing is relevant to the community as a whole.


From magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com  Wed Mar 30 22:20:51 2022
From: magnus.ihse.bursie at oracle.com (Magnus Ihse Bursie)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:20:51 +0200
Subject: OpenJDK Governing Board 2022 Election: Results
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR10MB54400FC68F64FF5B0F009106FB1F9@SJ0PR10MB5440.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
References: <SJ0PR10MB54400FC68F64FF5B0F009106FB1F9@SJ0PR10MB5440.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <d32bf01a-88a2-2723-653f-e10135836684@oracle.com>

Just a bit of nit picking; both the OpaVote landing page and the textual 
results at openjdk.java.netstates that the votes where counted using 
Scottish STV; but the GB election is supposed to use Meek STV according 
to the Bylaws. In this (and certainly, most elections) the same 
candidates win, but this is technically incorrect to show as a result.

/Mr Jobsworth :)

On 2022-03-30 16:59, Iris Clark wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Andrew Haley and Volker Simonis have been elected
> to fill the two At-Large seats of the OpenJDK Governing Board. [1]
>
> Details describing how votes were tallied may be found in the election
> results pages (html [2], text [3]).
>
> On behalf of the Board I congratulate Andrew Haley and Volker Simonis.
>
> Thanks to everyone who voted!
>
> Iris
>
> [1] https://openjdk.java.net/poll/gb/2022
> [2] https://www.opavote.com/results/6178041379160064
> [3] https://openjdk.java.net/poll/gb/2022/results