Confused by the JEP 0 page

[Daniel Schmid]

Hi,

It looks like most categories are ordered by JEP descending JEP number 
(most recent first) which seems like a good idea.

The only exceptions I found are the "Process JEPs" (which are in 
ascending order as you mentioned) and "Draft JEPs" where I don't know 
the ordering.

> Hello,
>
> I clicked on the JEP 0 page (basically the index of all JEP's), and I saw
> that the sections had been significantly reorganized. Which is nice.
>
> But I was very confused by the ordering of JEP's in the various different
> sections.
>
> In-Flight JEP's, it is pretty clear that they are ordered by their JEP
> number.
>
> But how are the other sections ordered? Definitely not by JEP number -
> that's clear from a glance. It is not creation timestamp either. And it's
> not last update timestamp either.
>
> Is there an ordering to it? And if not, could we add one?
>
> Thank you for your time!
> David Alayachew
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:<https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/6ea74de9/attachment.htm>
>
> End of discuss Digest, Vol 199, Issue 10
> ****************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/9b4eb73f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4490 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/9b4eb73f/smime.p7s>