Confused by the JEP 0 page

[David Alayachew]

Oh lol.

Could we fix that? That seems to be the most unhelpful way of ordering
things. Maybe last update time, or JEP/Issue number.

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 9:20 AM Robbe Pincket <robbepincket at live.be> wrote:

> Drafts are ordered alphabetically.
>
> Kind regards
> Robbe Pincket
>
> ------------------------------
> *Van:* discuss namens Daniel Schmid
> *Verzonden:* Dinsdag, 23 April, 2024 13:00
> *Aan:* discuss at openjdk.org
> *Onderwerp:* Re: Confused by the JEP 0 page
>
> Hi,
>
> It looks like most categories are ordered by JEP descending JEP number
> (most recent first) which seems like a good idea.
>
> The only exceptions I found are the "Process JEPs" (which are in ascending
> order as you mentioned) and "Draft JEPs" where I don't know the ordering.
>
> Hello,
>
> I clicked on the JEP 0 page (basically the index of all JEP's), and I saw
> that the sections had been significantly reorganized. Which is nice.
>
> But I was very confused by the ordering of JEP's in the various different
> sections.
>
> In-Flight JEP's, it is pretty clear that they are ordered by their JEP
> number.
>
> But how are the other sections ordered? Definitely not by JEP number -
> that's clear from a glance. It is not creation timestamp either. And it's
> not last update timestamp either.
>
> Is there an ordering to it? And if not, could we add one?
>
> Thank you for your time!
> David Alayachew
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/6ea74de9/attachment.htm> <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/6ea74de9/attachment.htm>
>
> End of discuss Digest, Vol 199, Issue 10
> ****************************************
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20240423/dd9dcb1c/attachment.htm>