[External] : Re: There is a regression in JDK 23, but I cannot attach a jar at bugreport.java.com.

[Chen Liang]

Hi Asva, this is a bug with proguard as they are creating invalid signatures, namely ones ending with >.; and they need to remove the trailing period before the semicolon in such signatures.

JDK 22 was erroneously permissive and such signatures were incorrectly parsed as an empty simple name.

Feel free to drop a link to proguard bug here once you made a report.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Asva Raten <nevuraketna at outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2024 11:44:52 AM
To: discuss at openjdk.org <discuss at openjdk.org>; Chen Liang <chen.l.liang at oracle.com>
Subject: [External] : Re: There is a regression in JDK 23, but I cannot attach a jar at bugreport.java.com.

Hi Chen Liang

I read your reply to the issue, does that mean that the issue will not be solved? I have to use the EOL JDK 22 at the moment. Since the class can be referenced and methods from it invoked without problems, I would expect jdeps to be able to handle it, but it is not my decision of course. Sorry, I can't reply on the issues website, that is why I am e-mailing.




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20241013/0e20a645/attachment.htm>