[icedtea patch] DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES / jni include dir

Thomas Fitzsimmons fitzsim at redhat.com
Wed Oct 3 10:15:51 PDT 2007

Matthias Klose wrote:
> Thomas Fitzsimmons schrieb:
>> Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> actually two patches:
>>>  - re-add DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES; this might be empty, but is very
>>>    conveniant to integrate patches before they are integrated in icedtea.
>> How would DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES be used?
> well, I should ask you, because it *was* there before ;)

Really?  Can you refer to a Mercurial revision that contains 
DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES?  I don't remember it being there.

> I'm setting it from the
> debian/rules file to include patches (like the gcc-version patch) which is not
> found upstream and in icedtea.

OK, that explains the confusion about "Makefile.am bits".  DISTRIBUTION_PATCHES 
seems fine to me.

>> > This seems fine, except why is "gcj" one of the installed symlinks?
> gcj/libgcj-config.h is included by jni_md.h.


Josh will commit this for you.


More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list