changeset in /hg/icedtea: 2008-02-15 Lillian Angel <langel at red...

[Lillian Angel]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2008-02-16 at 22:30 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>   
>> I haven't yet figured out what in the patch caused this. x86_64 is fine,
>> as is icedtea6 (both x86 and x86_64), which seems to contain the same
>> patch. The previous revision 00c531e8e94f builds fine.
>>     
>
> I think I figured out what was happening (although I don't see why it
> did build on my x86_64 box). The new icedtea-version.patch had an extra
> hunk that didn't apply. The build then skipped the whole patch but
> didn't fail. The following patch removes this extra hunk from the patch.
> And it makes sure the build aborts if any of the required patches
> doesn't apply cleanly (it still allows for some fuzz, maybe it makes
> sense to also disallow that since it might make a hunk apply to a wrong
> location).


Thanks for fixing this. Can you apply the same patch (to Makefile.am) in 
IcedTea6?


Thanks
Lillian