[icedtea zero] enable 32bit builds for powerpc
Gary Benson
gbenson at redhat.com
Mon Jul 21 04:30:26 PDT 2008
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Gary Benson wrote:
> > Christian Thalinger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 17:01 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > > diff -r 2f1e7255ab4d acinclude.m4
> > > > --- a/acinclude.m4 Wed Jul 16 10:10:45 2008 -0400
> > > > +++ b/acinclude.m4 Sun Jul 20 17:04:30 2008 +0200
> > > > @@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ AC_DEFUN([SET_ARCH_DIRS],
> > > > INSTALL_ARCH_DIR=arm
> > > > JRE_ARCH_DIR=arm
> > > > ;;
> > > > + powerpc-*-*)
> > > > + BUILD_ARCH_DIR=ppc
> > > > + INSTALL_ARCH_DIR=ppc
> > > > + JRE_ARCH_DIR=ppc
> > > > + ;;
> > > > + powerpc64-*-*)
> > > > + BUILD_ARCH_DIR=ppc64
> > > > + INSTALL_ARCH_DIR=ppc64
> > > > + JRE_ARCH_DIR=ppc64
> > > > + ;;
> > > > sparc64-*-*)
> > > > BUILD_ARCH_DIR=sparcv9
> > > > INSTALL_ARCH_DIR=sparcv9
> > >
> > > Hmm, I don't understand why we need this one. The default case
> > > uses `uname -m` and this should be "ppc" on 32-bit, no?
> >
> > Yeah, what does this do that the default case doesn't?
>
> On many Linux PPC boxes the kernel is 64-bit but userspace libraries
> are all installed as 32-bit. This is because 32-bit is usually much
> faster than 64-bit. We need to allow for this situation.
And does ./configure actually detect this?
Cheers,
Gary
--
http://gbenson.net/
More information about the distro-pkg-dev
mailing list