JDK 7 build 29 is available at the openjdk.java.net website

[Xiomara Jayasena]

Hi Mark,


Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Xiomara,
>
> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 08:14 -0700, Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
>   
>> Andrew John Hughes wrote: 
>>     
>>> On 20/06/2008, Xiomara Jayasena <Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com> wrote:
>>>       
>> [...]
>>     
>>>>  Summary of changes:
>>>>  http://download.java.net/jdk7/changes/jdk7-b29.html
>>>>         
>>> While moving IcedTea to b29, I noticed a couple of bugs that don't
>>> seem to be listed as applied against either b27, b28 or b29 (IcedTea
>>> was previously on b26), but have been applied:
>>>
>>> 6614100 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION while running Eclipse with 1.6.0_05-ea
>>> 6695553: Cleanup GPLv2+SPL legal notices in hat sources
>>>
>>> The second of the two doesn't even appear to be visible.  I obtained
>>> the bug number from Joe Darcy's announcement of OpenJDK6 b10.
>>>   
>>>       
>> The list of bugs for jdk b29 is unfortunately incomplete.  I am
>> working with integrators to ensure all bugs are marked appropriately
>> for each build.
>>     
>
> I also really appreciate these overviews. They make picking up patches
> to backport a lot easier. Thanks.
>
> How do you generate these lists? 

The list is generated from our bug database.  It is somewhat out of sync 
for now as one of the groups is still working out as to how that group 
mark's their bugs.

> And would it be possible to include a
> link to the actual mercurial patches/commits in the list?
>   

This maybe something that can be look into and since it is not created 
from the actual mercurial history it may not be as straight forward as 
one may think.

-Xiomara


> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20080626/836b050b/attachment.html