JDK 7 build 29 is available at the openjdk.java.net website

[Xiomara.Jayasena at Sun.COM]

Thanks for the clarification!  this will be look into.

-Xiomara


Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> For example, bug 6693457 should link to:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-rt/hotspot/rev/435e64505015
>
> or the equivalent changeset integrated into the main tree if there is
> one.  We try to do this with Classpath bugs; see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36221 for example.
>
> On 26/06/2008, Xiomara Jayasena <Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com> wrote:
>   
>>  Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>  2008/6/26 Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp.org>:
>>
>>
>>  Hi Xiomara,
>>
>> On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 08:14 -0700, Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
>>
>>
>>  Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>>
>>  On 20/06/2008, Xiomara Jayasena <Xiomara.Jayasena at sun.com> wrote:
>>
>>  [...]
>>
>>
>>
>>  Summary of changes:
>>  http://download.java.net/jdk7/changes/jdk7-b29.html
>>
>>
>>  While moving IcedTea to b29, I noticed a couple of bugs that don't
>> seem to be listed as applied against either b27, b28 or b29 (IcedTea
>> was previously on b26), but have been applied:
>>
>> 6614100 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION while running Eclipse with 1.6.0_05-ea
>> 6695553: Cleanup GPLv2+SPL legal notices in hat sources
>>
>> The second of the two doesn't even appear to be visible. I obtained
>> the bug number from Joe Darcy's announcement of OpenJDK6 b10.
>>
>>
>>  The list of bugs for jdk b29 is unfortunately incomplete. I am
>> working with integrators to ensure all bugs are marked appropriately
>> for each build.
>>
>>  I also really appreciate these overviews. They make picking up patches
>> to backport a lot easier. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>  Thanks from me too. The lists are invaluable when moving IcedTea to
>> the new bXX release.
>>
>>
>>
>>  How do you generate these lists? And would it be possible to include a
>> link to the actual mercurial patches/commits in the list?
>>
>>
>>  I think what's missing is that the commits aren't linked on the bug
>> report. Adding it there would
>> solve this issue and also help when simply searching the bug database.
>>
>>
>>  Could you be a little more specific?  like say bug id:
>>  6XXXXXX: what would you want that see link to? <.. >
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>  -Xiomara
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20080626/cc0a0109/attachment.html