New project: getting rid of IcedTea local patches

Andrew Haley aph at
Sat Apr 18 16:00:34 PDT 2009

Martin Buchholz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 02:50, Andrew Haley <aph at> wrote:
>> Martin Buchholz wrote:
>> Well, maintaining this "buffer" forest is, more or less, what IcedTea does.
>> I'm not sure that we need another one.
> I wasn't suggesting we start a new buffer forest.
> I was suggesting we (Google + IcedTea)
> consider sharing the forest at
> even though Google's patches didn't originate in IcedTea proper.

That's an excellent plan.


More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list