Zero patch consolidation

[Andrew John Hughes]

2009/12/8 Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu.com>:
> On 08.12.2009 14:42, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> b77 is already out, so I just need to get round to updating IcedTea7
>> to build against it, dropping the ia64 patch and part of the uname
>> patch (the rest I'll stick in a Debian subdir as it's specific to that
>> platform).
>
> the only Debian specific diff should be the mips/mipsel arch selection. is
> there anything else?
>
>  Matthias
>

Sorry, my mistake it's not arch but uname:

patches/icedtea-uname.patch:+  ifneq (,$(wildcard /usr/bin/dpkg-architecture))
patches/icedtea-uname.patch:+    mach := $(shell (dpkg-architecture
-qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU 2>/dev/null || echo $(mach)) | sed
's/powerpc$$/ppc/;s/hppa/parisc/')

There's also:

patches/icedtea-explicit-target-arch.patch:-  ifneq (,$(wildcard
/usr/bin/dpkg-architecture))
patches/icedtea-explicit-target-arch.patch:-    mach := $(shell
(dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU 2>/dev/null || echo $(mach)

and icedtea-print-lsb-release (print_debian_lsb_file).  I think the
gcc-suffix patches are also only used on Debian/Ubuntu as only those
distros build a gcc-x binary (at least I remember that being
mentioned).

There's nothing wrong with this, I'd just think it would be easier to
distinguish these from other more general patches.  Are any of these
destined for upstream?
-- 
Andrew :-)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Support Free Java!
Contribute to GNU Classpath and the OpenJDK
http://www.gnu.org/software/classpath
http://openjdk.java.net

PGP Key: 94EFD9D8 (http://subkeys.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: F8EF F1EA 401E 2E60 15FA  7927 142C 2591 94EF D9D8