What is the status of Zero on OpenJDK 7

[Michael Franz]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com> wrote:

> Michael Franz wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Gary Benson <gbenson at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Michael Franz wrote:
> > > > I was able to get past this by upgrading to llvm 2.6 (Fedora 11 as
> > > > 2.5).  I see post referencing llvm 2.7.  Is this going to be the
> > > > required version soon?
> > >
> > > There's no plans for that.  In the past we've generally supported as
> > > many versions as developers cared about.
> > >
> > > > I am building on a G4 which is 32 bits, but _LP64=1 is being
> > > > defined.  This is causing problems as jlong is being defined
> > > > incorrectly (long instead of long long).  How do I unset _LP64?
> > >
> > > What does 'uname -m' say on your machine?
> > >
> > > uname -m
> >
> > ppc
> >
> > I was able to get the build to progress by setting ARCH_DATA_MODEL=32
> > before calling make.  I did this since there didn't seem to be a case
> > where the ARCH was equal to ppc and it then defaults to 64.
>
> Interesting.  Is this with IcedTea7?
>
> Yes,  It is current TIP as of a few days ago.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/distro-pkg-dev/attachments/20091111/9a531ed8/attachment.html