Joe Darcy Joe.Darcy at Sun.COM
Tue Oct 6 17:21:50 PDT 2009

Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> 2009/10/5 Joseph D. Darcy <Joe.Darcy at sun.com>:

[big snip]
>> Hello.
>> Any results for the jdk/test regression tests?
>> -Joe
> JDK: Test results: passed: 3,269; failed: 168; error: 3
> The failed seems high, the number of errors matches our usual JTreg
> runs.  I'll have to take a closer look but I don't usually do runs on
> this box.  What were your own results like for OpenJDK6 b17?

My results for building OpenJDK 6 on Ubuntu 9.04 x64 and running tests 
there are:

Test results: passed: 24

Test results: passed: 1354

Test results: passed: 3,100; failed: 43; error: 1

All test suites were run with "-a -ignore:quiet"; in addition, langtools 
was run with "-s".

I've uploaded my summary.txt files to:

(The jdk tests were run a bit differently than my usual test setup where 
I point the graphical tests into a virtual framefer.  In this case, I 
just ran the tests without redirecting the graphics.)

I haven't looked at the IcedTea patch set recently; if the Gervill sound 
tests are still being duplicated, I think the IcedTea copies can be 
removed at this point since Karl is keeping the OpenJDK 6 copy of the 
code and tests up-to-date.


More information about the distro-pkg-dev mailing list